﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top Ten books to read on the intelligent design controversy, 2009 #5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uncommondescent.com/top-ten-id-stories/top-ten-books-to-read-on-the-intelligent-design-controversy-2009-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/top-ten-id-stories/top-ten-books-to-read-on-the-intelligent-design-controversy-2009-5/</link>
	<description>Serving The Intelligent Design Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:28:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: O&#39;Leary</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/top-ten-id-stories/top-ten-books-to-read-on-the-intelligent-design-controversy-2009-5/comment-page-1/#comment-349032</link>
		<dc:creator>O&#39;Leary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 15:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=12047#comment-349032</guid>
		<description>Mung at 3,

All writer/editors who want to survive must be extremely biased - in favour of a good story. 

The problem usually arises with the fact base, not with the - shall we say - &quot;tell-ability&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mung at 3,</p>
<p>All writer/editors who want to survive must be extremely biased &#8211; in favour of a good story. </p>
<p>The problem usually arises with the fact base, not with the &#8211; shall we say &#8211; &#8220;tell-ability&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mung</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/top-ten-id-stories/top-ten-books-to-read-on-the-intelligent-design-controversy-2009-5/comment-page-1/#comment-348950</link>
		<dc:creator>Mung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 07:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=12047#comment-348950</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;But I am hardly an unbiased source; I am a writer and editor.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
All writers are biased.

All editors are biased

All writers who are also editors must be extremely biased.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But I am hardly an unbiased source; I am a writer and editor.</p></blockquote>
<p>All writers are biased.</p>
<p>All editors are biased</p>
<p>All writers who are also editors must be extremely biased.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: O&#39;Leary</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/top-ten-id-stories/top-ten-books-to-read-on-the-intelligent-design-controversy-2009-5/comment-page-1/#comment-348924</link>
		<dc:creator>O&#39;Leary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 22:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=12047#comment-348924</guid>
		<description>Thanks for pointing that out, Heinrich. Okay, end of story.

However, I rather wish Britain would reform its libel laws.

Keeping publications on tenterhooks for months is not the way to go, in my view. But I am hardly an unbiased source; I am a writer and editor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for pointing that out, Heinrich. Okay, end of story.</p>
<p>However, I rather wish Britain would reform its libel laws.</p>
<p>Keeping publications on tenterhooks for months is not the way to go, in my view. But I am hardly an unbiased source; I am a writer and editor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heinrich</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/top-ten-id-stories/top-ten-books-to-read-on-the-intelligent-design-controversy-2009-5/comment-page-1/#comment-348915</link>
		<dc:creator>Heinrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 18:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=12047#comment-348915</guid>
		<description>Denyse, this is what is written at the top of the New scientist article you link to:

&lt;blockquote&gt;This article was temporarily taken down on legal advice after New Scientist&#039;s editor, Roger Highfield, received a letter from a law firm on behalf of James Le Fanu, the GP and author of the book Why Us? Following discussions, New Scientist has now reinstated the article accompanied by a comment from Dr Le Fanu.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I think there&#039;s a hint in there about the identity of the complainant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Denyse, this is what is written at the top of the New scientist article you link to:</p>
<blockquote><p>This article was temporarily taken down on legal advice after New Scientist&#8217;s editor, Roger Highfield, received a letter from a law firm on behalf of James Le Fanu, the GP and author of the book Why Us? Following discussions, New Scientist has now reinstated the article accompanied by a comment from Dr Le Fanu.</p></blockquote>
<p>I think there&#8217;s a hint in there about the identity of the complainant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

