﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So Dawkins thinks design can be studied? Plus links!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uncommondescent.com/the-design-of-life/so-dawkins-thinks-design-can-be-studied-plus-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/the-design-of-life/so-dawkins-thinks-design-can-be-studied-plus-links/</link>
	<description>Serving The Intelligent Design Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:45:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: DLH</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/the-design-of-life/so-dawkins-thinks-design-can-be-studied-plus-links/comment-page-1/#comment-256596</link>
		<dc:creator>DLH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/the-design-of-life/so-dawkins-thinks-design-can-be-studied-plus-links/#comment-256596</guid>
		<description>Current news:  	
&lt;a href=&quot; 	
Hawking: Unintelligent life is likely on other planets&quot;&gt;Hawking: Unintelligent life is likely on other planets&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt; . . . If there is life elsewhere in the universe, Hawking asks why haven&#039;t we stumbled onto some alien broadcasts in space, maybe something like &quot;alien quiz shows?&quot;

Hawking&#039;s comments were part of a lecture at George Washington University on Monday in honor of NASA&#039;s 50th anniversary. He theorized that there are possible answers to whether there is extraterrestrial life.

One option is that there likely isn&#039;t life elsewhere. Or maybe there is intelligent life elsewhere, but when it gets smart enough to send signals into space, it also is smart enough to make destructive nuclear weapons.

Hawking said he prefers the third option:

&quot;Primitive life is very common and intelligent life is fairly rare,&quot; he then quickly added: &quot;Some would say it has yet to occur on earth.&quot;  . . .&lt;/blockquote&gt;

In light of Dawkins&#039; positing the possibility of intelligent causes  and panspermia, are Hawkings&#039; statements to be construed as &quot;science&quot;,  &quot;hypothesis&quot;, &quot;speculation&quot;, &quot;news&quot;, or &quot;fiction&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Current news:<br />
<a href="<br />
Hawking: Unintelligent life is likely on other planets">Hawking: Unintelligent life is likely on other planets</a></p>
<blockquote><p> . . . If there is life elsewhere in the universe, Hawking asks why haven&#8217;t we stumbled onto some alien broadcasts in space, maybe something like &#8220;alien quiz shows?&#8221;</p>
<p>Hawking&#8217;s comments were part of a lecture at George Washington University on Monday in honor of NASA&#8217;s 50th anniversary. He theorized that there are possible answers to whether there is extraterrestrial life.</p>
<p>One option is that there likely isn&#8217;t life elsewhere. Or maybe there is intelligent life elsewhere, but when it gets smart enough to send signals into space, it also is smart enough to make destructive nuclear weapons.</p>
<p>Hawking said he prefers the third option:</p>
<p>&#8220;Primitive life is very common and intelligent life is fairly rare,&#8221; he then quickly added: &#8220;Some would say it has yet to occur on earth.&#8221;  . . .</p></blockquote>
<p>In light of Dawkins&#8217; positing the possibility of intelligent causes  and panspermia, are Hawkings&#8217; statements to be construed as &#8220;science&#8221;,  &#8220;hypothesis&#8221;, &#8220;speculation&#8221;, &#8220;news&#8221;, or &#8220;fiction&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

