Home » Culture, Science » What a scientist should be

What a scientist should be

Here is a reasonable assessment of a scientist about what she can do (from Janet D. Stemwedel):

… to say an awful lot about the research projects I have completed (although perhaps a bit less about them when they were still underway).

to say something about the more or less settled knowledge, and about the live debates, in my research area (assuming, of course, that I have kept up with the literature and professional meetings where discussions of research in this area take place).

to say something about the more or less settled (as opposed to “frontier”) knowledge for my field more generally (again, assuming I have kept up with the literature and the meetings).

One could listen to this person without enforced interest.

  • Delicious
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feed

One Response to What a scientist should be

  1. “to recognize, and be wary of, logical fallacies and other less obvious pseudo-scientific moves (e.g., I should call shenanigans on claims that weaknesses in theory T1 count as support for alternative theory T2).

    to recognize that experts in fields of science other than my own generally know what the heck they’re talking about.

    to trust scientists in fields other than my own to rein in scientists in those fields who don’t know what they are talking about.”

Leave a Reply