Science’s biggest problem today: Not enough scientists are drinking the Fool-Aid
|September 20, 2011||Posted by News under Culture, Global Warming, News, Science|
The global warming debate is interesting, for what it tells us about science culture today. What the environment studies teacher probably does not tell your kid:
Mr. Giaever [eminent physicist dissenter] was an American Physical Society fellow, an honor bestowed on “only half of one percent” of the members, according to a spokesman. He follows in the footsteps of University of California at Santa Barbara Emeritus Professor of Physics Harold Lewis, a former APS fellow who resigned in 2010, calling global warming “the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life as a physicist.”
Other dissenters include Stanford University physicist and Nobelist Robert B. Laughlin, deceased green revolution icon and Nobelist Norman Borlaug, Princeton physicist William Happer and World Federation of Scientists President Antonino Zichichi. Our point is not that all of these men agree on climate change, much less mankind’s contribution to it, only that to one degree or another they maintain an open mind about warming or what to do about it.
Which makes them a big problem in what passes for science today.
Follow UD News at Twitter!