Can human spatial sense help tell humans from machines?
| September 16, 2011 | Posted by News under Mind, News |
Originally called the Turing test, after computer pioneer Alan Turing who first proposed it, the human vs. machine test proved more functional than philosophical in the age of searchbots, spambots (and whatbots?).
Veronica Greenwood reports on a new approach, from “How Human Are You? A New Turing Test Relies on Spatial Relations” Discover (September 14, 2011):
… scientists have noticed that humans describe where objects are in space in a specific way, taking into account what spatial relationships would be most useful for a human listener. Artificial intelligences, even fairly sophisticated ones, talk about space differently, and the difference is large enough that it can form the basis of a new type of Turing test, British scientists reported at a conference in April. Now, New Scientist has developed an interactive version of the test, which lets you see for yourself what statements about space set off your silicon-lifeform alarms. So what’s behind it?
As so often. It’s hoped that the research will help develop less frustrating automated directions.
You know the type: “Turn right, 10 metres” – when anyone would say “Turn right at the Memorial.”
See also: Coffee: Hate captchas? Relief is ON the way: A proposed alternative to captchas, those wonky letters you are asked to identify when posting comments.
4 Responses to Can human spatial sense help tell humans from machines?
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.

A few notes on ‘spatial relations’ being a test for true consciousness as opposed to artificial intelligence of computers. First, as to ‘spatial relations’, I noticed that in this following video, on the optical effects for a observer approaching the speed of light, that the 3- Spatial Dimensions, we currently live in, ‘folded and collapsed’ into a tunnel shape, around the direction of travel, as the observer approached the constant of the speed of light.,,,
Please note the ‘light at the end of the tunnel’, at the 3:22 minute mark of the preceding video, which uncannily matches very many of the Judeo-Christian Near Death Experience testimonies of western cultures;
Also of related note to how the 3-Dimension world folds and collapses into a tunnel shape, as the ‘higher dimension’ of the speed of light is approached, is the ‘eternality of time’ revealed by the time dilation of special relativity.
This higher dimension, ‘eternal’, inference for the time framework of light is warranted because light is not ‘frozen within time’ yet it is shown that time, as we understand it, does not pass for light.
But since the material particles, of the person’s body who is having a Near Death Experience, are clearly ‘staying behind’ as the person is having the Near Death Experience, then, of course, the consciousness of the person must be based in something other than the material particles of the body. Something that is transcendent of the material realm. Also of interest, as the Cern Particle Accelerator readily testifies, it is not ‘natural’ for material particles to approach the speed of light and, indeed, takes a massive amount of energy for even sub-atomic particles to closely approach the speed of light. This transcendent something, on which human consciousness is actually based instead of the material particles, is quantum information. Quantum Information is shown to be foundational to the human body here:
Whereas, quantum information is strongly implicated in human consciousness here:
And quantum information is shown to be transcendent of any material basis here:
And quantum information is shown to be ‘conserved’ here;
Of related note; I really enjoyed Michael Egnor’s take down on Artificial Intelligence not being truly conscious;
Foot notes:
Sorry wrong link, here is the corrected link for the Michael Egnor article:
The only difference in principle between computers and people is free will. In practice there are probably more differences.