Plagiarism: The Letter of the Law Versus the Spirit of the Law
|December 15, 2006||Posted by GilDodgen under Legal, Courts|
Judge Jones — by accepting widespread praise for the most salient and important part of his decision in its written form, without acknowledging the true authors — has implicitly taken credit for what was not his. In my view, this constitutes de facto plagiarism, and it should be called what it is.
What say you?