“I suspect that Darwin’s racism was a factor in corporate disinterest. What if someone started quoting key relevant passages from Darwin’s Descent of Man? Like that black people are closer to gorillas than white people are?”

Since the modern theory says Darwin was right, that is, his prediction that apes first began to evolve into men in Africa is true, the problem exists today.

Darwinism is gutter racism, not science. Why do Darwinists get a free pass? Why aren’t they repressed as vile racists for insisting apes morphed into Africans?

Answer: Because the microphone is controlled by Darwinists too.

Let us not forget what Darwin hath wrought: Nobel winner microbiologist James Watson:

http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/s.....index.html

BEGIN LINK QUOTE
Watson was quoted as saying he was “inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa” because “all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours, whereas all the testing says not really.”
END LINK QUOTE

In addition: Ronald Fisher, who Richard Dawkins called the greatest scientist since Darwin, was Professor of Eugenics (= white superiority).

According to MIT Professor Huston Smith: “In 1919 the Brooklyn Zoo exhibited an African American caged alongside chimpanzees and gorillas” (“Why Religion Matters” 2001:17).

WE WERE TOLD that evolution was based on evidence; if so, why were Darwinists committing this most vile act of depravity—-in 1919, that is, 37 years after Darwin died?

According to Edward Larson, writing in “Evolution: The History Of A Remarkable Theory” Darwin accepted apes that he had been observing in the London zoo to correspond to dark skinned savages that he encountered on the HMS Beagle voyage (2004:66-67).

And the coup de grace: Most people do not know that Charles Darwin left Thomas Henry Huxley, that is, the man who he sanctioned to speak for him most of his professional life, that is, the man who called himself Darwin’s bulldog, a huge sum of money in his will that was forwarded to Huxley before Darwin died. Let us now listen to the bulldog:

“No rational man, cognizant of the facts, believes that the average negro is the equal, still less the superior, of the white man. And if this be true, it is simply incredible that, when all his disabilities are removed, and our prognathous relative has a fair field and no favour, as well as no oppressor, he will be able to compete successfully with his bigger-brained and smaller-jawed rival, in a contest which is to be carried out by thoughts and not by bites” (“Lectures and Lay Sermons” 1926:115).

O’Leary: “If you accept the argument in Descent of Man, you accept a racist argument.”

So true, all Darwinists are gutter racists. AFTER God was rejected as Creator THEN Darwin suddenly “saw” a “similarity” between apes and dark skinned peoples.

In other words, Darwinism was born in pre-existing racism. It was this racism that “answered” a question that did not exist before, that is, “where did the human race come from?” When Genesis is rejected the answer is rooted and based in pre-existing racism that, as we have seen above, continues unabated.

Ray