Comments on: The New Spontaneous Generationists http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/the-new-spontaneous-generationists/ Serving The Intelligent Design Community Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:02:58 +0000 hourly 1 By: Nakashima http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/the-new-spontaneous-generationists/comment-page-1/#comment-316434 Nakashima Tue, 05 May 2009 04:49:34 +0000 http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=6661#comment-316434 Thank you Mr Fox! Of course, atheists are the only ones capable of true altruism, since theists think they will be rewarded eventually for their good deeds! ;) Thank you Mr Fox!

Of course, atheists are the only ones capable of true altruism, since theists think they will be rewarded eventually for their good deeds! ;)

]]> By: Alan Fox http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/the-new-spontaneous-generationists/comment-page-1/#comment-316341 Alan Fox Mon, 04 May 2009 18:58:04 +0000 http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=6661#comment-316341 Atheistic altruism, Nakashima-san? I guess English is not your first language, so may I point out that the phrase "I want to give you one" could get you into trouble if you are ever in England. Atheistic altruism, Nakashima-san?

I guess English is not your first language, so may I point out that the phrase “I want to give you one” could get you into trouble if you are ever in England.

]]> By: Nakashima http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/the-new-spontaneous-generationists/comment-page-1/#comment-316337 Nakashima Mon, 04 May 2009 18:24:24 +0000 http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=6661#comment-316337 Mr Deyes, I saw your thread had no comments, so I wanted to give you one! I read your article. It doesn't mention any failures of scientists researching OOL. Why quote Dawkins from the 1980s when the man is not a working scientist? If you were aiming for polemic misdirection, you succeeded. Mr Deyes,

I saw your thread had no comments, so I wanted to give you one!

I read your article. It doesn’t mention any failures of scientists researching OOL. Why quote Dawkins from the 1980s when the man is not a working scientist?

If you were aiming for polemic misdirection, you succeeded.

]]>