Home » Darwinism, Intelligent Design, Media, News » Tech writer says she is a creationist—how long do you give her day job?

Tech writer says she is a creationist—how long do you give her day job?

Virginia Heffernan Recently, tech writer Virginia Heffernan confessed to being a creationist, saying, among other things:

Also, at heart, I am a creationist. There, I said it. At least you, dear readers, won’t now storm out of a restaurant like the last person I admitted that to. In New York City saying you’re a creationist is like confessing you think Ahmadinejad has a couple of good points. Maybe I’m the only creationist I know.

Well, that’s easy enough to fix. Lose the people who storm out of restaurants when someone civilly disagrees with them.

Joining the ID community will give you a chance to refine your ideas of origins, with access to facts that the storm troopers are too dense to know, or often  ignore or suppress.

Hearteningly, Heffernan writes,

Cut to now. I still read and read and listen and listen. And I have never found a more compelling story of our origins than the ones that involve God. The evolutionary psychologists with their just-so stories for everything (“You use a portable Kindle charger because mothers in the primordial forest gathered ginseng”) have become more contradictory than Leviticus. Did you all see that ev-psych now says it’s women who are naturally not monogamous, in spite of the same folks telling us for decades that women are desperate to secure resources for their kids so they frantically sustain wedlock with a rich silverback who will keep them in cashmere?

Sigh. When a social science, made up entirely of observations and hypotheses, tells us first that men are polygamous and women homebodies, and then that men are monogamous and women gallivanters—and, what’s more builds far-fetched protocols of dating and courtship and marriage and divorce around these notions—maybe it’s time to retire the whole approach.

She’s right of course, but she’s not alone there either. Materialist atheist philosopher Jerry Fodor wrote What Darwin Got Wrong to counter that flood tide of bilge. Generally, some of the best slams come from agnostics. So, Heffernan, if you like a broad mix of companions, you’ll get along just fine with us.

Meanwhile, stupid remarks from Darwin’s PR team (oops, we meant the popular science press, if course, apologies, apologies) will likely be Heffernan’s lot, including this implied threat from Gawker:

We are not saying you’re a bad person, Virginia, but you should probably expect that, from now on, when people read your musings on, say, the future of internet communications, they might stop, in a moment of gathering doubt, and recall that you are a science-phobic angel-believing climate change skeptic, and that therefore your dedication to facts is somewhat in question.

If anyone dumps her on account of this controversy, we urge that readers help retire that source of information by little heeding it hereafter. Fortunately, there are plenty of reliable sources out there who can tolerate her suspicions of Darwin’s cult, and indeed share them.

Hat tip: Stephanie West Allen at Brains on Purpose

  • Delicious
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feed

8 Responses to Tech writer says she is a creationist—how long do you give her day job?

  1. OT: podcast – Dr. Stephen Meyer on The Dennis Prager Show
    http://intelligentdesign.podom.....6_41-07_00

  2. Why would anyone storm out of a restaurant simply because someone else admitted to being a creationist? That’s the stupidest reaction I’ve ever heard.

  3. We’ve had worse. These people don’t need God because Darwin is their God. Not clear whether it is his punishment or theirs or both that that is what ended up happening. – O’Leary

  4. We are not saying you’re a bad person, Gawker, but you should probably expect that, from now on, when people read your musings on, say, the future of internet communications, they might stop, in a moment of gathering doubt, and recall that you are a science-phobic magical mutation-believing climate change alarmist, and that therefore your dedication to facts is somewhat in question.

    :razz:

  5. What does Virginia mean by “creationist”?

  6. semi OT: How Information Theory Is Taking Intelligent Design Mainstream – William Dembski
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UCLJKLQNbs

  7. I’m glad to see she had the courage to stand by her convictions. ,,, It must have been another woman who stormed out of the restaurant on her. I can’t imagine any man ever storming out on that lady at a restaurant. She’s gorgeous! But of course when it comes to the Darwinian faithful who knows, it now might be against their religion to marry outside the faith. :)

  8. Wow. Virginia Heffernan is great! Clear and concise.The Discovery Institute should hire her to speak to the general public. If the New York Times doesn’t want her, I’m sure theBlaze.com will and they probably have more readers as well.

Leave a Reply