Anyone with an iota of common sense and limited observation powers will easily concede that such vile and venemous hatred always leads to an environment of harassment. It doesn’t take a smart person to realize this.

And, so as not to get away from my main point – does anyone have any evidence to back up allegations of what happened at NCBI?

I’m wondering, do you deny that he was harassed, demoted and/or persecuted for his belief in intelligent design?

He resigned from his position as Staff scientist at the National Center for Biotechnology Information after it became impossible to continue working there because of changes to working conditions both formal and informal.

What evidence do you have for this? I haven’t heard anything about why he left the NCBI: the only mention of them in his claims is this:

Pressure was put on the National Center for Biotechnology Information (part of the National Institutes of Health) to fire me.

Nothing about changes to the working conditions.

All of the allegations investigated by the OSC were about what happened at the NMNH, which is a totally different institute to the NCBI, who were Sternberg’s employers.

Follow the link because you don’t seem to understand what constructive dismissal is.

http://www.businessdictionary......issal.html

It is a very obvious clear cut case of constructive dismissal.

If someone attempts to answer your question you ignore it and pretend it hasn’t been answered.

He resigned from his position as Staff scientist at the National Center for Biotechnology Information after it became impossible to continue working there because of changes to working conditions both formal and informal. This amounts to constructive dismissal by even the strictest definition.

Nobody said that NCBI fired Sternberg; Barb mentioned how she was mystified that people lose their jobs because of their disbelief in evolution.

Right, so where was he fired/constructively dismissed from? Can’t be the Smithsonian – they didn’t employ him. What job did he lose?

“Expelled Exposed” Exposed: Your One-Stop Rebuttal to Attacks on the Documentary Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed

When your agenda driven link is exposed is it really too much to let the facts speak for themselves?

It takes no stretching of any facts to see that these people were harassed and, in some cases, fired or dismissed because of what they believe.

Since you’re familiar with a website debunking Stein’s film, can I ask if you’ve seen the film itself?

For the rest – http://www.expelledexposed.com/

We find them all there, and it takes some stretching of fact to claim they were Expelled.

Is it too much to ask that the facts are laid bare; don’t they speak for themselves?