Susan Mazur’s Exposé of the Evolution Industry
| December 26, 2009 | Posted by Jonathan Wells under Intelligent Design |
New Zealand journalist Susan Mazur has published a fascinating book about some of the current controversies among evolutionary biologists. The book is a loosley edited collection of interviews with, and comments about, various people, including the Altenberg 16. Her favorites are the “two Stus” — Stuart Newman and Stuart Kauffman.
Despite the fact that Mazur seems unreflectively to share the antipathy toward ID expressed by all her subjects, and despite the fact that her book sometimes reads like a gossip column, I consider it worth reading. Some excerpts:
“Evolutionary science is as much about the posturing, salesmanship, stonewalling and bullying that goes on as it is about actual scientific theory… Perhaps the most egregious display of commercial dishonesty is this year’s celebration of Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of Species-the so-called theory of evolution by natural selection, i.e., survival of the fittest, a brand foisted on us 150 years ago.” (p. v)
“The consensus of the evolution pack still seems to be that if an idea doesn’t fit in with Darwinism and neo-Darwinism-keep it out.” (p. vii)
“[Evolutionary biologist Massimo] Pigliucci often prefers mudslinging to enlightenment.” (p. 12)
“When I called Kevin Padian, president of the NCSE’s board of directors and a witness at the 2005 Kitzmiller v. Dover trial on intelligent design, to ask him about the evolution debate among scientists-he said, ‘On some things there is no debate.’ Then he hung up.” (p. 29)
“[Quoting Antonio Lima-de-Faria] It is known that the pattern of an embryo is decided by a large collection of small and large RNA’s, i.e., pure atomic processes, which have the ‘road map’ that decides the cellular pathways. [Quoting Stuart Newman] This could not be more wrong.” (p. 59)
Susan Mazur, The Altenberg 16: An Exposé of the Evolution Industry (Wellington, New Zealand: Scoop Media, 2009).
33 Responses to Susan Mazur’s Exposé of the Evolution Industry
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Collin – certainly I deny demoted and persecuted. Harassed, possibly, depending on what exactly happened. It’s clear that one person at the NMNH didn’t like him, so there would have been a frosty atmosphere when that person was around. But more than that I can’t say – I wasn’t there and I haven’t seen allegations about specific events.
And, so as not to get away from my main point – does anyone have any evidence to back up allegations of what happened at NCBI?
With the kind of disdain and emotional response that the ID position evokes in many Darwinians, I am surprised that anyone would doubt that such dismissals are not a possibility, their probability increasing in direct relation to the level of revulsion.
Anyone with an iota of common sense and limited observation powers will easily concede that such vile and venemous hatred always leads to an environment of harassment. It doesn’t take a smart person to realize this.
I really do wonder how far hatred/animosity towards a particular ideology would go into affecting a person’s attitude/treatment of those who espouse such ideology.