Comments on: Spread the word – Evolution is a scientific fact

By: angryoldfatman

angryoldfatman — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:54:53 +0000

I thought the Brites’ article was pretty funny until I read these comments. LOL! An order of magnitude funnier.

I’m glad I didn’t have to slog through all of the transitional comments that competed for the finite bandwidth in this thread; I understand there were billions of them.

By: larrynormanfan

larrynormanfan — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:20:39 +0000

You may not be dead, but your beak keeps changing size. What’s up with that?

By: Galapagos Finch

Galapagos Finch — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:18:07 +0000

Nor am I.

Gloppy

By: larrynormanfan

larrynormanfan — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:07:02 +0000

I had thought that Peter Schickele was dead. But I looked him up and apparently he’s not.

By: Michaels7

Michaels7 — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 06:05:12 +0000

IDs perspective is we march to the beat of an intelligent drummer.

Darwinistas perspective is they march to the confusion of unintelligent noise that appears to be created by an intelligent drummer, but is truly not. They must constantly remind themselves this of this “truth.”

A-sharp is really B-flat by accidental collisions and explosions from the beginning of time.

Atom for example only appears to put lyric and melody together in blends that cause one to tap their foot with emotional responses. In reality, his music is noise generated by random variations and unguided selection of sounds. It is an accident that I recommended he contact Jon Anderson. Do it Atom Get Closer to the Edge.

Our ears only hear what we think is designed notational inspirations of intelligence. In truth, the composition of Mahler’s Four Seasons is no different from white noise, which is no different from Atom’s bop your head with revelatory I Am returning chords of praise or the momentary bleat bleat of the Knights that say Neeeee.

I can only imagine that music existed prior to our being and has been infused to our universe by the soul of one Sachmo, King of Jazz and perculator of pearly white smiles when not playing a trumpeters lullaby on the sunny side of the street.

I’d suggest you watch the movie, A Song is Born, 1948, with Louis and other jazz greats…. teaching a Professor of music; Danny Kaye about ID jazz.

http://www.nndb.com/films/227/000035122/

Despite the above review, the ending has a good beat
Its a wonderful world, ohhh yeah…

By: Mapou

Mapou — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 06:02:06 +0000

LOL. AussieD, thank you for that almost-lesson. I almost got it.

By: AussieID

AussieID — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 05:41:35 +0000

Mapou, once upon a time, an almost-human exhaled, creating an almost-note that was almost-heard by an-almost bird. The almost-bird almost-turned believing it had almost-heard the sound of a cavalier male almost-bird wishing to mate. It came over to be almost caught by the almost-human, but not quite.

The almost-human almost learnt from this first experience of almost communicating with a totally different species (though some said that they were almost related to them!) but, unfortunately, did not follow up on this almost incredible act of mimicry.

Instead, he invented-the-tissue-over-the-comb and wooed the ladies.

Almost.

Now, Mapou, have you learnt something vital from this?

(Is there a PhD dissertation somewhere in this Galapagos?)

By: AussieID

AussieID — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 05:31:13 +0000

Hmmm … a theocratic wedgie.

The image is painful!

By: Mapou

Mapou — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:34:17 +0000

Speaking of musical pathology, what are the selection pressures that led to humans spending so much time enjoying and creating music, something that has no survival value? Is music enjoyment in the genes or is it a spiritual phenomenon? Ok, I realize that Darwinists have no answers for these questions but what’s the ID perspective on the subject?

By: Apollos

Apollos — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:15:36 +0000

In defense of Finch, the configuration of words and letters in his article is really no less likely than any other arrangement.