http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/sketches-from-the-toronto-id-conference-1/ Serving The Intelligent Design Community Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:07:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/sketches-from-the-toronto-id-conference-1/comment-page-1/#comment-66289 Sketches from the Toronto ID conference - okay, a bit of context - 2 | Uncommon Descent Mon, 02 Oct 2006 01:20:12 +0000 http://www.uncommondescent.com/archives/1670#comment-66289 [...] RSS ← Sketches from the Toronto ID Conference 1 [...] [...] RSS ← Sketches from the Toronto ID Conference 1 [...]

]]> http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/sketches-from-the-toronto-id-conference-1/comment-page-1/#comment-66284 Apoptosis Mon, 02 Oct 2006 01:05:10 +0000 http://www.uncommondescent.com/archives/1670#comment-66284 All very true. The conference was quite interesting, I'm a little suprised by the big turn out. However, I wasn't surprised that Professor Moran, U of T Biochem. Professor, was there. Especially he writes for talkreason.org and is quite an arrogant guy. I hope one day he will have a formal debate with some ID person or any well-known scholar who is against Darwinism. Don't be suprised if that does happen in the future because I will try to arrange it myself. All very true. The conference was quite interesting, I’m a little suprised by the big turn out. However, I wasn’t surprised that Professor Moran, U of T Biochem. Professor, was there. Especially he writes for talkreason.org and is quite an arrogant guy. I hope one day he will have a formal debate with some ID person or any well-known scholar who is against Darwinism. Don’t be suprised if that does happen in the future because I will try to arrange it myself.

]]> http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/sketches-from-the-toronto-id-conference-1/comment-page-1/#comment-66253 truthseeker Sun, 01 Oct 2006 19:54:23 +0000 http://www.uncommondescent.com/archives/1670#comment-66253 Denyse: thanks for your first anecdotal response. I have read elsewhere (on this blog?) that the current generation may simply have to die off, given the faith system/creation myth of naturalism/darwinism. A key issue then is what the young people think, both graduate and undergraduate students. What were the objectives of the organizers? How evenly balanced were the ID friendly and evolution friendly speakers? What was the temper of the questions asked? Finally, how well received was the notion of a testable creation model? Denyse: thanks for your first anecdotal response. I have read elsewhere (on this blog?) that the current generation may simply have to die off, given the faith system/creation myth of naturalism/darwinism. A key issue then is what the young people think, both graduate and undergraduate students. What were the objectives of the organizers? How evenly balanced were the ID friendly and evolution friendly speakers? What was the temper of the questions asked? Finally, how well received was the notion of a testable creation model?

]]>