﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SCIENCE&#8217;S BLIND SPOT by Cornelius Hunter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/sciences-blind-spot-by-cornelius-hunter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/sciences-blind-spot-by-cornelius-hunter/</link>
	<description>Serving The Intelligent Design Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:18:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel King</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/sciences-blind-spot-by-cornelius-hunter/comment-page-1/#comment-129955</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 21:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/sciences-blind-spot-by-cornelius-hunter/#comment-129955</guid>
		<description>The only philosophical bias of science is absolute reliance on empirical evidence.

Options that are not testable are beyond the ken of science.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only philosophical bias of science is absolute reliance on empirical evidence.</p>
<p>Options that are not testable are beyond the ken of science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bornagain77</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/sciences-blind-spot-by-cornelius-hunter/comment-page-1/#comment-129564</link>
		<dc:creator>bornagain77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 13:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/sciences-blind-spot-by-cornelius-hunter/#comment-129564</guid>
		<description>This is a very good point to remember the next time naturalist claim in court that ID is pushing a religious agenda. They are the ones who are in fact guilty of insulting scientific inquiry by not considering all options valid prior to investigation and considering their philosophical bias true no matter what the evidence says!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very good point to remember the next time naturalist claim in court that ID is pushing a religious agenda. They are the ones who are in fact guilty of insulting scientific inquiry by not considering all options valid prior to investigation and considering their philosophical bias true no matter what the evidence says!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darwiniana &#187; Science&#8217;s blindspot (and ID&#8217;s)</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/sciences-blind-spot-by-cornelius-hunter/comment-page-1/#comment-129460</link>
		<dc:creator>Darwiniana &#187; Science&#8217;s blindspot (and ID&#8217;s)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/sciences-blind-spot-by-cornelius-hunter/#comment-129460</guid>
		<description>[...] Picked up from UD: ScienceÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s Blind Spot: The Unseen Religion of Scientific Naturalism (Paperback) by Cornelius G. Hunter (Author) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Picked up from UD: ScienceÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s Blind Spot: The Unseen Religion of Scientific Naturalism (Paperback) by Cornelius G. Hunter (Author) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

