﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One for the &#8220;unabashed bigotry&#8221; files</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/one-for-the-unabashed-bigotry-files/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/one-for-the-unabashed-bigotry-files/</link>
	<description>Serving The Intelligent Design Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:02:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Borne</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/one-for-the-unabashed-bigotry-files/comment-page-1/#comment-305991</link>
		<dc:creator>Borne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=5357#comment-305991</guid>
		<description>Off topic: Denyse, did you see this one from new scientist on the evolutionary origin of moral revulsion? Excerpt: &quot;She speculates that moral revulsion evolved out of more primal forms of disgust to help people avoid untrustworthy individuals.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Off topic: Denyse, did you see this one from new scientist on the evolutionary origin of moral revulsion? Excerpt: &#8220;She speculates that moral revulsion evolved out of more primal forms of disgust to help people avoid untrustworthy individuals.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mynym</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/one-for-the-unabashed-bigotry-files/comment-page-1/#comment-305965</link>
		<dc:creator>mynym</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=5357#comment-305965</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Is there some ID friendly forum around where I could ask such questions without having to worry about whether it’s “on topic”?&lt;/i&gt;

There&#039;s less comment moderation at:

http://telicthoughts.com/
or
http://www.intelldesign.com/

And there are probably others that I don&#039;t know of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Is there some ID friendly forum around where I could ask such questions without having to worry about whether it’s “on topic”?</i></p>
<p>There&#8217;s less comment moderation at:</p>
<p><a href="http://telicthoughts.com/" rel="nofollow">http://telicthoughts.com/</a><br />
or<br />
<a href="http://www.intelldesign.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.intelldesign.com/</a></p>
<p>And there are probably others that I don&#8217;t know of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vpr</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/one-for-the-unabashed-bigotry-files/comment-page-1/#comment-305857</link>
		<dc:creator>vpr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=5357#comment-305857</guid>
		<description>&quot;Notice that these people - despite being supposedly smart - never ask themselves the obvious question, let alone answer it - so why did Darwin lose his faith then? And why are we not allowed to think that the answer to that question matters?&quot;

It&#039;s because Darwinist can do what they like and call it science. Even invoking arguments of bad design and religion. The bottom line is no matter what you do, your data will cause you to make meta physical inferences. They just don&#039;t like (or can&#039;t stand/tolerate) our inferences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Notice that these people &#8211; despite being supposedly smart &#8211; never ask themselves the obvious question, let alone answer it &#8211; so why did Darwin lose his faith then? And why are we not allowed to think that the answer to that question matters?&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s because Darwinist can do what they like and call it science. Even invoking arguments of bad design and religion. The bottom line is no matter what you do, your data will cause you to make meta physical inferences. They just don&#8217;t like (or can&#8217;t stand/tolerate) our inferences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KRiS_Censored</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/one-for-the-unabashed-bigotry-files/comment-page-1/#comment-305856</link>
		<dc:creator>KRiS_Censored</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=5357#comment-305856</guid>
		<description>Off Topic: ID Forum(s)?

I often have specific questions about ID, but they are usually off topic for any given UD post. Is there some ID friendly forum around where I could ask such questions without having to worry about whether it&#039;s &quot;on topic&quot;?

I would prefer a predominantly ID centered forum so that I can get the ID perspective, rather than getting answers of &quot;ID guys would answer like this...&quot; from someone who doesn&#039;t really know, but wants to make ID proponents look bad by presenting bad arguments (a problem I&#039;ve actually encountered before).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Off Topic: ID Forum(s)?</p>
<p>I often have specific questions about ID, but they are usually off topic for any given UD post. Is there some ID friendly forum around where I could ask such questions without having to worry about whether it&#8217;s &#8220;on topic&#8221;?</p>
<p>I would prefer a predominantly ID centered forum so that I can get the ID perspective, rather than getting answers of &#8220;ID guys would answer like this&#8230;&#8221; from someone who doesn&#8217;t really know, but wants to make ID proponents look bad by presenting bad arguments (a problem I&#8217;ve actually encountered before).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tribune7</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/one-for-the-unabashed-bigotry-files/comment-page-1/#comment-305798</link>
		<dc:creator>tribune7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=5357#comment-305798</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;hollering for Jesus in a damp, smelly tabernacle somewhere&lt;/i&gt;

Not that there&#039;s anything wrong with that :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>hollering for Jesus in a damp, smelly tabernacle somewhere</i></p>
<p>Not that there&#8217;s anything wrong with that <img src='http://www.uncommondescent.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

