Off Topic: Addiction: Ideas that do not help
| May 11, 2009 | Posted by O'Leary under Intelligent Design |
Nora Volkow, director of the US National Institute on Drug Abuse, writes in Time:
David Sheff wrote a beautiful book called, appropriately enough, Beautiful Boy A Father’s Journey Through His Son’s Meth Addiction, one of the most compelling portrayals I’ve ever read of a parent’s loss of a child to drugs. …
Many people still call addiction a moral failing. But 20 years of research tells us that it’s a disease that results in part from the damage that abused drugs to the brain circuits required for self-control. Unfortunately that damage is long-lasting, meaning that the person remains vulnerable to relapse even after years of successful rehabilitation.
Sheff’s experiences highlight how poorly our society addresses addiction. … Yet punishment and stigmatization do nothing to ameliorate the problem. How could they, when about 50% of addiction is rooted in our genes and much of the rest is due to social and cultural factors such as stressful childhood experiences?
All true, but all irrelevant, and in my view, harmful.
Every recovering addict I have ever spoken to – and I used to have a social sciences beat – has simply decided to get better, and acted on the decision. Punishment and stigmatization often play a useful role because they help the addict remain aware that the problem is real, and costly. That’s important, because the addict is often in a conflicted state about whether to just drop out again into the unreal world of addiction, as opposed to pursuing recovery. If the rest of the world is vague and unreal too, what is the addict supposed to do?
Most, wisely, call themselves “recovering” addicts for that very reason.
Look, I don’t wish anyone hardship, but the mid- and late-life consequences of addiction can be horrific, so the last thing the typical addict needs to be told is, “You can’t help it.”
A better message would be, “Addiction is NOT a brain disease. It is a choice for coping with a world that is difficult for every human being. So what can we do to help you cope, while shedding your addiction?”
33 Responses to Off Topic: Addiction: Ideas that do not help
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
little p: “i am sad also that my comment on the unique nature of addiction to the pornographic appears to have slipped beneath the radar – or however we are to conceive of the relevance-filters at work..
..and play!”
I think perhaps that pornography “addiction” falls more in the lines of obsession, than with addiction, so perhaps it’s a little off topic. However, this entire thread is a little off topic.
I think the difference between an obsession and an addiction lies in the fact that obsession tends to change over time – people’s tastes in pornography can change from one particular feature to another, whereas, a drug addict is more or less addicted to the drug of choice, and is consistent in that choice, because it does something to him/her physically.
Pornographic obsession does nothing physically, really, it’s all psychological, it appears.
for me it is the pretty much soul of relevance no less that we might actually (act ye as if u are my natural ally) have a discussion on a site such as UD about what might newly constitute in our estimation the difference between addiction and ‘mere’ ‘onsession’- i mean obsession! Snesh! There is every beaston ( a small niggly heretofore undiscovered but definitely conceived-of particle) to bendlessly relive that first moment when another’s body was percieved to be different than our own! That there should now be an industry dedicated to ensuring i never forget that no two bodies are the same and that this very reminder might forever jiggle the jar in which my brain is supposed to be resting is a consideration that i would expect ONLY the best intelligent designers to take on! (there, i’ve said it)