New Design of Life blog promises exciting coverage of intelligent design issues
|December 18, 2007||Posted by O'Leary under Intelligent Design|
The first three posts:
1. Welcome to the Design of Life blog!
Excerpt: ” Here at this blog you will see the evidence run through a filter that accepts the possibility of purpose and design. That means that sometimes you will see the same evidence but without the just-so stories that rescue Darwinism. You will see lots of evidence you wouldn’t otherwise know about. In no case will you see the kind of thing you hear increasingly from popular (and sometimes tax-supported) media. For example, here are some things we WON’T tell you: 1. What Pleistocene man “would have done”. For example, he “would have had several mates in order to spread his selfish genes.” Actually, I don’t know what Pleistocene man would have done. Do you? Did he? When we don’t know that something actually happened, we won’t tell you that it did. We certainly won’t tell you that it “would have happened” in order to promote some otherwise useless or failed Darwinist theory.”
2. The Big Bang of flowers – an abominable mystery? Or an opportunity to really understand?
Can scientists shed light on Charles Darwin’s “abominable mystery” – the Big Bang of early plant evolution? Flowering plants evolved quite quickly into five groups, according to scientists at the University of Florida and the University of Texas at Austin (ScienceDaily, November 27, 2007) …
3. The “Copernican” myth, and other science myths – the undead still walk!
The myth that Copernicus’s model of the universe “dethroned” humans is a vampire that refuses to die. In Physics Today, Mano Singham tries yet again! to drive a nail through the monster’s heart. Singham writes (December 2007, page 48) about the promoters of the myth …