﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My interview at Skeptiko &#8211; a bit of a wild ride!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/my-interview-at-skeptiko-a-bit-of-a-wild-ride/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/my-interview-at-skeptiko-a-bit-of-a-wild-ride/</link>
	<description>Serving The Intelligent Design Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:17:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: jjcassidy</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/my-interview-at-skeptiko-a-bit-of-a-wild-ride/comment-page-1/#comment-306410</link>
		<dc:creator>jjcassidy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 08:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=5398#comment-306410</guid>
		<description>On the linked topic of sexual mores in Britain, it&#039;s quite ironic that after you have kids--based on your &quot;own views&quot; of right and wrong--the government doesn&#039;t want to let you exercise your &quot;own views&quot; on what to tell the kids.

Pretty telling that the government intends to become the ultimate moral authority, they&#039;ve just decided that sexual mores are neutral as an absolute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the linked topic of sexual mores in Britain, it&#8217;s quite ironic that after you have kids&#8211;based on your &#8220;own views&#8221; of right and wrong&#8211;the government doesn&#8217;t want to let you exercise your &#8220;own views&#8221; on what to tell the kids.</p>
<p>Pretty telling that the government intends to become the ultimate moral authority, they&#8217;ve just decided that sexual mores are neutral as an absolute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: absolutist</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/my-interview-at-skeptiko-a-bit-of-a-wild-ride/comment-page-1/#comment-306361</link>
		<dc:creator>absolutist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 19:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=5398#comment-306361</guid>
		<description>These resources also offer an intelligible defense of Christian dualism and human personhood:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0415962404/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Consciousness and the Existence of God&lt;/a&gt; by J.P. Moreland.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0830826947/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Philosophical Foundations for a Christian Worldview&lt;/a&gt; by J.P. Moreland and William Lane Craig.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0830815775/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Body &amp; Soul&lt;/a&gt; by J.P. Moreland and Scott B. Rae.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These resources also offer an intelligible defense of Christian dualism and human personhood:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0415962404/" rel="nofollow">Consciousness and the Existence of God</a> by J.P. Moreland.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0830826947/" rel="nofollow">Philosophical Foundations for a Christian Worldview</a> by J.P. Moreland and William Lane Craig.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0830815775/" rel="nofollow">Body &amp; Soul</a> by J.P. Moreland and Scott B. Rae.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tragic mishap</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/my-interview-at-skeptiko-a-bit-of-a-wild-ride/comment-page-1/#comment-306334</link>
		<dc:creator>tragic mishap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 14:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=5398#comment-306334</guid>
		<description>DaveScot reminds me a lot of Mr. MacPhee.  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DaveScot reminds me a lot of Mr. MacPhee.  <img src='http://www.uncommondescent.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: O'Leary</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/my-interview-at-skeptiko-a-bit-of-a-wild-ride/comment-page-1/#comment-306323</link>
		<dc:creator>O'Leary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 12:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=5398#comment-306323</guid>
		<description>Hi all, I make mistakes, but the transcript appears to have been produced by someone without a good ear for conventional English.

I must obviously have said &quot;cranks,&quot; not &quot;pranks,&quot; for example. That isn&#039;t even a mistake I could make because &quot;cranks&quot; is the conventional word for the context. There would be no reason for me to use an unconventional word that didn&#039;t even convey what I was trying to say. (= beware cranks who can discredit your project)

I enjoyed the interview with Alex and hope he continues to pursue and think about these subjects.

Re That Hideous: Yes, it is my second favourite CS Lewis novel. He deals adequately with the growth of a science-based cult. But what is even more interesting to me is the general indifference of the public -unfortunately.

My favourite scene is when N.I.C.E. has displaced a number of peop[le from their homes and passersby assume they must be bad people or it wouldn&#039;t be happening. 

People are too ready to attribute virtue to people who show no sign of it, and vice to people who haven&#039;t done anything especially wrong.

We are neck deep in that right now in Canada - but we are beginning to wake up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all, I make mistakes, but the transcript appears to have been produced by someone without a good ear for conventional English.</p>
<p>I must obviously have said &#8220;cranks,&#8221; not &#8220;pranks,&#8221; for example. That isn&#8217;t even a mistake I could make because &#8220;cranks&#8221; is the conventional word for the context. There would be no reason for me to use an unconventional word that didn&#8217;t even convey what I was trying to say. (= beware cranks who can discredit your project)</p>
<p>I enjoyed the interview with Alex and hope he continues to pursue and think about these subjects.</p>
<p>Re That Hideous: Yes, it is my second favourite CS Lewis novel. He deals adequately with the growth of a science-based cult. But what is even more interesting to me is the general indifference of the public -unfortunately.</p>
<p>My favourite scene is when N.I.C.E. has displaced a number of peop[le from their homes and passersby assume they must be bad people or it wouldn&#8217;t be happening. </p>
<p>People are too ready to attribute virtue to people who show no sign of it, and vice to people who haven&#8217;t done anything especially wrong.</p>
<p>We are neck deep in that right now in Canada &#8211; but we are beginning to wake up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tragic mishap</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/my-interview-at-skeptiko-a-bit-of-a-wild-ride/comment-page-1/#comment-306313</link>
		<dc:creator>tragic mishap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 05:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=5398#comment-306313</guid>
		<description>Alex Tsakiris: &quot;Alex Tsakiris: Yes, maybe.  It’s just kind of sounds like you’re again maybe letting your religious doctrine kind of drive some of that.&quot;

Well, gee Alex, it&#039;s quite obvious you&#039;re not ever letting religious convictions influence your interpretation of science.  

Alex Tsakiris: &quot;But the Christian position should just be whatever science, whatever real science tells us that’s the direction we go because that’s as closest we can get to truth.&quot;

Is that a scientific statement?  Because if it&#039;s not, then it cannot be as close to the truth as a scientific statement is, and therefore could be wrong.  This guy has logic issues.  

As per usual, the people who cry the most about listening to science aren&#039;t really in it for the science at all.  Their primary intent is to attack Christianity. 

Mark 13:13: 
&quot;All men will hate you because of me, but he who stands firm to the end will be saved.&quot;

&quot;That Hideous Strength&quot; anyone?  Denyse have you read that one by C.S. Lewis?  The bad guys in the book revive a dead guy&#039;s brain so that it starts talking to them.  They form a cult that treats the brain as god and do whatever it says.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex Tsakiris: &#8220;Alex Tsakiris: Yes, maybe.  It’s just kind of sounds like you’re again maybe letting your religious doctrine kind of drive some of that.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well, gee Alex, it&#8217;s quite obvious you&#8217;re not ever letting religious convictions influence your interpretation of science.  </p>
<p>Alex Tsakiris: &#8220;But the Christian position should just be whatever science, whatever real science tells us that’s the direction we go because that’s as closest we can get to truth.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is that a scientific statement?  Because if it&#8217;s not, then it cannot be as close to the truth as a scientific statement is, and therefore could be wrong.  This guy has logic issues.  </p>
<p>As per usual, the people who cry the most about listening to science aren&#8217;t really in it for the science at all.  Their primary intent is to attack Christianity. </p>
<p>Mark 13:13:<br />
&#8220;All men will hate you because of me, but he who stands firm to the end will be saved.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;That Hideous Strength&#8221; anyone?  Denyse have you read that one by C.S. Lewis?  The bad guys in the book revive a dead guy&#8217;s brain so that it starts talking to them.  They form a cult that treats the brain as god and do whatever it says.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tragic mishap</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/my-interview-at-skeptiko-a-bit-of-a-wild-ride/comment-page-1/#comment-306312</link>
		<dc:creator>tragic mishap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 05:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=5398#comment-306312</guid>
		<description>Alex Tsakiris seems a little pre-occupied with the idea that &quot;near-death&quot; experiences are equal to entering heaven, therefore this means there is universal salvation.  

Excuse me, but I think God is just a little smarter than Miracle Max, and even Max can tell when someone is all-dead or only mostly dead.  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4BRI0NtQ1DU</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex Tsakiris seems a little pre-occupied with the idea that &#8220;near-death&#8221; experiences are equal to entering heaven, therefore this means there is universal salvation.  </p>
<p>Excuse me, but I think God is just a little smarter than Miracle Max, and even Max can tell when someone is all-dead or only mostly dead.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4BRI0NtQ1DU" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4BRI0NtQ1DU</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tragic mishap</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/my-interview-at-skeptiko-a-bit-of-a-wild-ride/comment-page-1/#comment-306311</link>
		<dc:creator>tragic mishap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 04:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=5398#comment-306311</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s an interview, Denyse, not an article.  No one would blame you for making a few mistakes.  I&#039;m sure we all would make more than you would.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an interview, Denyse, not an article.  No one would blame you for making a few mistakes.  I&#8217;m sure we all would make more than you would.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nullasalus</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/my-interview-at-skeptiko-a-bit-of-a-wild-ride/comment-page-1/#comment-306273</link>
		<dc:creator>nullasalus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 23:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=5398#comment-306273</guid>
		<description>Interesting interview, though the interviewer&#039;s understanding of Christianity (not to mention Catholicism in particular) was kind of odd. The idea that heaven is segregated such that christians are here and everyone else is over here is just unusual to me.

Though to his credit, I like that someone will take on the mantle of &#039;skeptic&#039; and not be an obnoxious new atheist, which seems to be the usual routine. And he seemed more open minded than I&#039;d normally expect. (I recall him interviewing Michael Behe and being pretty laid back as well, which is a plus.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting interview, though the interviewer&#8217;s understanding of Christianity (not to mention Catholicism in particular) was kind of odd. The idea that heaven is segregated such that christians are here and everyone else is over here is just unusual to me.</p>
<p>Though to his credit, I like that someone will take on the mantle of &#8216;skeptic&#8217; and not be an obnoxious new atheist, which seems to be the usual routine. And he seemed more open minded than I&#8217;d normally expect. (I recall him interviewing Michael Behe and being pretty laid back as well, which is a plus.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

