Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

“My Failed Simulation” in Human Events

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

The best argument for Intelligent Design is to clearly state the opposing view, which is that physics explains all of chemistry (probably true), chemistry explains all of biology, biology explains intelligence, and intelligence explains computers, science textbooks and the Internet; ergo, physics explains computers, ergo, my little parable “My Failed Simulation”, which has now appeared at Human Events here . They re-titled it and added a subtitle that I don’t like, but otherwise I’ll take responsibility for the content.

I added the adjective “imaginary” to “friend” in the third paragraph to make sure no one took this parable too literally, but it looks like that may not have been sufficient, to judge by the first comment.

Comments
Whoop, I meant "second" intelligent and relevant comment of the day. Actually, it was the third, the one right after yours was great too, he said "Exactamundo. Everything SCheesman said."Granville Sewell
February 16, 2008
February
02
Feb
16
16
2008
07:06 AM
7
07
06
AM
PDT
(hurt feelings) Hmm, so my preceding comment was either stupid or irrelevant? :)SCheesman
February 16, 2008
February
02
Feb
16
16
2008
05:37 AM
5
05
37
AM
PDT
Yes, thanks magnan, that was the first intelligent and relevant comment of the day.Granville Sewell
February 15, 2008
February
02
Feb
15
15
2008
02:28 PM
2
02
28
PM
PDT
I posted a response to Granville's article, at http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=25030&page=5&cp=1#hec129276 . I chose not to get into the ongoing debate over God's existence.magnan
February 15, 2008
February
02
Feb
15
15
2008
01:15 PM
1
01
15
PM
PDT
If you have any comments, I would prefer you make them at Human Events, at the bottom of the article.Granville Sewell
February 15, 2008
February
02
Feb
15
15
2008
01:27 AM
1
01
27
AM
PDT

Leave a Reply