Materialist myths: Religious people opposed anesthesia in childbirth!
|July 7, 2007||Posted by O'Leary under Intelligent Design|
There couldn’t be a better example of the warfare between religion and science than anesthesia in childbirth. Religious folk, we are told, opposed anesthesia in childbirth because women should suffer, right? Indeed, the claim that religious folk opposed such anesthesia has become a minor but regular component of the folklore of materialism.
Medical historian A. D. Farr actually went to the trouble of methodically searching the literature from Britain in the 1840s and 1850s, where modern anesthesia during childbirth was first introduced there. He found that religious opposition to the introduction of childbirth anesthesia was a figment of later propaganda.
How did the idea get started, despite a lack of evidence? Well, now, that’s a story ….
Read the rest at Overwhelming Evidence, a student friendly ID site – and encourage students to visit as well and get wise about some of this stuff.