I should have said that it will change the way science is validated with respect to evolution.

But it appears that the multiverse argument can never have the explanatory power of the Darwinian argument simply because the multiverse does not have any real observational data. It is merely a guess mandated by materialist assumptions. If ID shows that those materialist assumptions are invalid, then the multiverse argument falls on its face as well. There may be some who still cling to it out of philosophical necessity, but not out of empirical necessity.

There’s another discussion similar to this going on in the next blog post, where they are comparing Darwinism with all of the other scientific theories, and the difference lies in the mathematical rigour by which other theories are formulated – not so in Darwinism.

The point being, that if ID wins, it will be because of a rigourous presentation of the facts, not because of an opposing collection of fairy tales. And as such, this will change the way science is validated as science. Therefore, unless the multiverse arguments are backed by mathamatical rigour, they too will fail the test of validity as science.

Yes, because the materialists have clung to the only scenario that could be true under materialist assumptions: Neo-Darwinism.

It means that methodological naturalism as the driving method behind doing science also loses.

Going wherever the evidence leads transcends all assumptions, materialist and non-materialist. Flew got it right.

Oh, but wait, the DNA evidence simply shows that in the distant past, human evolution branched off when humans interracted with oppossums, and a new species was born.

“What the materialists can’t get their head around is that if “Darwinism” loses, ID wins by default…”

How many here would agree with that statement?

I can’t make the pictures on the guys’ Web site come in (maybe just my system?)

Here’s the National Post’s view: Best quote out of this may be:

“This is becoming like an alien autopsy,” Jeffery Meldrum, a noted Bigfoot researcher and a professor of anthropology at Idaho State University, said. “It’s shenanigans.”

Reuters informs me (surprise, surprise), the man-ape failed a DNA test, so the father (s) of the presumed hoax are the hikers. Also noted there: “The spread of the online story was fuelled by a photograph of a hairy heap, bearing a close resemblance to a shaggy full-body gorilla costume, stuffed into a container resembling a refrigerator.”

There, that’s what comes of overeating and failing to shave. Evolution at work, folks, you just saw it demonstrated.

When confronting stories like this, I always say, first check the calendar. August is the chronological home of the hot weather story.

http://www.searchingforbigfoot.com

I suspect it’s another hoax that’s gotten more press than most similar “reports?”, but in the very slightest chance that it may be real, what will Darwinists do with it?

“The Darwinians will, of course, continue to get considerable help from the pop science media”

Oh, so that’s what’s going on. Who woulda thunkit?

Shut up, they explained.

You have a way with words Denyse. This really does encapsulate most Darwinian explanations.