Jumping to Design Conclusions
|March 24, 2010||Posted by David Coppedge under Intelligent Design|
An archaeologist has been studying stone spheres in Costa Rica and has concluded they were designed. According to PhysOrg, he doesn’t know who made the spheres, when they were made, or why they were made. Why is he jumping to a conclusion of intelligent design? He should be considering natural explanations. There are plenty of natural forces that can make a sphere and even simulate hammer marks. By concluding design, he has brought the scientific investigation of these stones to a standstill.
To be a scientist, you can’t take the easy way out and assume design every time you see something you can’t explain. Some designer, too; some of the stones are up to two inches out of round. Who is the designer? And who designed the designer? Science is supposed to be about natural explanations for natural phenomena. This stones are perfectly natural; they are not made up of some angelic material or something. If this professor doesn’t have a good enough imagination to make up a naturalistic story, he doesn’t belong in science.