“If it’s really true, then you have problems of contradictions between Genesis 1 and 2.”

No there are not, providing that you realise that Genesis 2:19 wayyitser should be translated as the pluperfect “had formed”. So say Keil & Delitzsch, Leupold and the NIV, as documented here.

“I think therefore you’ve got a problem with how long are the days before the sun shows up in the fourth day.”

Booo-Rinnnng! We know today that all it takes to have a day-night cycle is a rotating Earth and light coming from one direction. The Bible tells us clearly that God created light on the first day, as well as the Earth. Thus we can deduce that the Earth was already rotating in space relative to this created light.

God can, of course, create light without a secondary source. We are told that in the new heavens and Earth there will be no need for sun or moon (Rev 21:23). In Genesis, God even defines a day and a night in terms of light or its absence.

The Church Fathers Theophilos and Basil suggested that God made the plants before the sun to show up the foolishness of pagan sun worship, since the vegetation preceded the sun. They clearly didn’t see the problem that this Keller person did. Neither did Calvin, who argued that on Day 4, God assigned the sun to take over the job of lightgiver to the earth, replacing the diffused light.

“You have problems really reading the Bible in a straightforward way with a young-Earth, six 24-hour day theory.”

No, just a problem with his arrogance.

What about predation, disease and natural evil before the fall?

I believe in human thinking death is the ultimate form of evil/suffering. Once death exists predation, disease and natural evil are all secondary details. We fear death because we are moratl. I think this is the basis of the problem of our interpretation. God is immortal and must have a different view of death then ourselves.
Predation is death by a carnivore, disease is death by a bacteria or virus, and natural evil is death/suffering by natural phenomemon. Since seeds were created by God and death can be assumed as part of the natural order before the fall, then any of these paths to death, including an old peaceful death is a possibility, although not explicit in the text. I believe these types of death can be reasonably inferred. Job 38:41 expresses a sense the divine view of the natural balance better than I can: ‘Who provides for the raven its prey, when its young ones cry to God, and wander about for lack of food?”

All “catholic” talks about evolution are just opinions and reflections – even if it comes from the Pope.

Are Catholic ideas about evolution any more (or less) “just opinions and reflections” than those offered by any other Christian denomination? Are some Christian denominations more “right” than others about these issues?

“Peter, what about predation, disease and natural evil before the fall?

Maybe, I don’t understand Catholic theology.”

The Catholic Church has no official “theology” about predation, disease and natural evil before the Fall.

What it does have is theology of the Fall, and with that original sin, and salvation.

All “catholic” talks about evolution are just opinions and reflections – even if it comes from the Pope.

I honestly believe, that they are our paladins of the church.

I know!
Finally, there is a powerful alternative theory to Darwinist trash-science. ID is the best argument from incredulity that’s come around in centuries. That said, arguments from incredulity aren’t necessarily wrong; they’re rather reliable and are employed constantly and consistently by everyone every day.

G-d bless, you friend.