If It Looks Like a Duck and Quacks Like a Duck…
|July 8, 2006||Posted by Dave S. under Intelligent Design|
… it’s probably a duck. I was reading John Lynch’s blog Stranger Fruit and ran across this comment by Tiax who is a frequent commenter from the loyal opposition here:
It strikes me as odd that they would use the word ‘intuitive’ when the folks at Uncommondescent are so happy to point out the very intuitive nature of design detection. “This looks very designed to me” is often a good enough rationale
It strikes me as odd that people who have no problem believing that a few fossilized bone fragments or teeth “that look like a transitional species” is always a good enough rationale to call it a transitional species would complain about us calling something with the appearance of design a design. Help me out here. Is Tiax applying a double standard or what?