ID “a branch of creationism” – Adam Rutherford from Nature
|November 7, 2008||Posted by idnet.com.au under Intelligent Design|
Adam Rutherford from Nature shows he is blinded even to an understanding of the difference between ID and creationism. In his teacher’s TV rant he calls for the re-education of the 18% of UK science teachers not convinced that Darwinism has, in his words, “withstood all attacks”.
Commenting on the same survey, UK Daily Telegraph defines ID as “the theory that the universe shows signs of having been designed rather than evolving”
In their failure to even grasp the basic definition of ID, these people are, the words of Richard Dawkins, “either stupid, ignorant or dare I say it, evil.”