(reflects upon the funniest just-so story he’s ever read)

The literal reading of genesis suddenly doesn’t seem so stupid anymore…

http://www.news.cornell.edu/st......fish.html

glad to know that emitting humming noises through your bladder to attract fish to your nest led us to Barry White a couple of hundred million years later..

Publisher: Intercollegiate Studies Institute; 2 edition (October 28, 2008)

Second edition?

-DU-

as I’ve read many times that ID does not speculate on the identity of the desiner, rather limiting it’s self to detection of that design.

Have you got a potted summary of the other conceptual lines that have been mooted

“as has been discussed many times here, an “intelligent cause” could be along many other conceptual lines”ndy, as I’ve read many times that ID does not speculate on the identity of the desiner, rather limiting it’s self to detection of that design.

Only one problem, based on the book description. It says “It is no longer possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist because life’s origin requires an intelligent cause—this book shows why.” This appears to conflate “intelligent cause” with the Biblical God. Technically, as has been discussed many times here, an “intelligent cause” could be along many other conceptual lines, which would also solve the theodicity problem – theodicity being the study of the problem of evil from a religious perspective.

I’ve written about the psychology of atheism and intelligent design. So far, I have only atheists arguing against me, and fairly specifically against Dembski.

Atheists tend to believe that they are the true intellectuals and anyone who believes in God or ID lacks intelligence. Glad to see your new book. I’ll be buying a copy.