Henry Gee in Nature: “We know that, as a depiction of evolution, this line-up is tosh. Yet we cling to it.”
| October 6, 2011 | Posted by News under Human evolution, Intelligent Design, News |
Cling to it, yes, and pound it into schoolkids’ heads, by force of law.
Here’s a human evolution book that might definitely be worth reading, to judge from Henry Gee’s review, “Palaeoanthropology: Craniums with clout” Nature, 478, 34 (06 October 2011): “A look at two early human fossils reveals the prejudices in ideas about human evolution, finds Henry Gee”.
Reviewing Dean Falk, The Fossil Chronicles: How Two Controversial Discoveries Changed Our View of Human Evolution (University of California Press: 2011), he writes,
We have all seen the canonical parade of apes, each one becoming more human. We know that, as a depiction of evolution, this line-up is tosh. Yet we cling to it. Ideas of what human evolution ought to have been like still colour our debates.
Palaeoanthropologist Dean Falk debunks some modern myths in her brilliant book, The Fossil Chronicles, by comparing the case histories of two famous fossils. A career spent teasing meaning from the brain casts of fossil hominins (creatures more closely related to Homo sapiens than to chimpanzees) has led Falk into the debate on the cognitive abilities of Homo floresiensis. This dwarfed hominin — nicknamed the Hobbit — lived on the Indonesian island of Flores between approximately 95,000 and 14,000 years ago, and was discovered in 2003 (see Nature 431, 1055–1061; 2004). Falk also describes Raymond Dart’s 1924 discovery in South Africa of a juvenile skull of Australopithecus africanus, the Man-Ape of South Africa, and locates an unpublished manuscript by Dart on the find that chimes with her views.
Apparently, the defenders of the Piltdown Man fraud prevented a lot of good science along the decades-long way.
(You have to pay to read the article right now, but keep watching.)
2 Responses to Henry Gee in Nature: “We know that, as a depiction of evolution, this line-up is tosh. Yet we cling to it.”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
The point of the article is that contrary to the expectations of early researchers who, as Gee puts it,
the evidence that Falk reviews suggest just the opposite, that big brains arose after upright walking evolved. From the article:
Gee adds:
Hmmm, at least he got this much right;
But he seem to have missed the memo on this:
These following studies confirm that the ‘Hobbits’ are actually human:
The Hobbit ‘hoax’ is very similar in nature to the many other infamous, and outright, hoaxes presented by neo-Darwinists for human evolution. Many that were perpetuated for years in the past before being overturned:
Here are some sobering quotes:
This paper was interesting
Moreover Darwinists keep forgetting to tell people of the growing genetic chasm between man and apes that advancing science is now revealing:
as well neo-Darwinists seem to keep ‘conveniently’ forgetting to tell people that they have no demonstrated mechanism, much less a actual example, to account for ‘trivial’ change much less such macro-change;