Home » Intelligent Design » Evolutionists Are Losing Ground Badly: Both Pattern and Process Contradict the Aging Theory

Evolutionists Are Losing Ground Badly: Both Pattern and Process Contradict the Aging Theory

It just doesn’t make sense that the entire biological world spontaneously arose all by itself. But the challenges to evolution go far beyond the intuition. When Charles Darwin proposed his unlikely idea in 1859 it defied much of what was known about biology in that day. Today, the situation has only become worse. If there was ever a modern-day myth this is it and science is increasingly revealing this with its empirical findings dealing with both biological patterns and processes.  Read more

  • Delicious
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feed

11 Responses to Evolutionists Are Losing Ground Badly: Both Pattern and Process Contradict the Aging Theory

  1. When will these lying, cheating, evidence tampering, delusional, anti-science lunatics be brought to justice?

    Aside from holding science hostage for the past 150+ years, their anti-life ideology is responsible for the deaths and suffering of many.

    I propose a truth and reconciliation committee. Those responsible for this heinous crime against humanity would be given the chance to come clean and make right their many wrongs.

    How much longer are we expected to tolerate this atheist creation myth?

  2. When will these lying, cheating, evidence tampering, delusional, anti-science lunatics be brought to justice?

    You’re absolutely right.

    As far as I know Luskin, Dembski, O’Leary and the rest are still at large!

  3. As far as I know Luskin, Dembski, O’Leary and the rest are still at large!

    Yes and busy exposing all the lying, cheating, evidence tampering, delusional, anti-science lunatics.

  4. Oooh, this looks fun. Can I play?

    Yes and busy exposing all the lying, cheating, evidence tampering, delusional, anti-science lunatics.blockquote>
    Every time they talk about each other, yes.

    Joe, on to you…

  5. And Joe, do a better job of closing your tags than I did. :-(

  6. I believe the problem is much deeper than Darwinism. “Zionism” goes hand-in-hand with Darwinism.

  7. Zionism? In what manner does TOE go hand-in-hand with Zionism?

  8. coresa: “I propose a truth and reconciliation committee.”

    The State ‘coming to grips’ with the ‘wrong’ morality is just as bad as the State pushing the ‘right’ one. Assuming you see State religions as ‘bad’. If you don’t, then ignore this.

  9. 9

    Joe,

    ” “As far as I know Luskin, Dembski, O’Leary and the rest are still at large!”

    Yes and busy exposing all the lying, cheating, evidence tampering, delusional, anti-science lunatics.”

    efforts of yourself seem to fall after such busy persons as well. good efforts!

  10. Everyone looks at their little piece of the huge evolutionary puzzle and although their little piece has problems, they just figure that because of all the other pieces that seem to be well fitted, the answers for the issues of their own little problem will one day be found. There must be an answer because of all the other evidence we have. After all, how could their one little puzzle piece really not fit, if all the other pieces fit so nicely?

    Problem is, there are very few pieces of the puzzle that really fit nicely. Most, not all, but most of the pieces have problems but in their minds, the overall picture is a given, a non-negotiable, so they work hard, even to the point of believing seeming impossible scenarios, to find a way to make them fit.

    Hence the multitude of ad hoc explanations, glossing over of unknowns, and unwavering faith in future solutions that dominate the evolutionary sciences.

    The tree of life argument has fallen. The vestigial organ argument has fallen. Even the junk DNA argument is crumbling. Small incremental change argument is highly questionable given the Cambrian Explosion, and stasis in the fossil record. The anomalies in cosomological evolution are so numerous as to be embarrassing.(And if cosmological evolution doesn’t work we don’t even get an earth on which life can evolve!)

    While evolutionary evidence is under siege, evidence for ID is piling up. Irreducible complexity, volumes of highly specific encoded information in the genome, impossibility of abiogenesis, finely tuned universe, etc.

  11. The trouble is that you IDers have no faith; you don’t believe in magic, unless its effected by an omnipotent God.

    Random chance were never as authoritarian as God. Leave the abiogenetecists be. You’re just bigots! Truth bigots, even when God seems mean.

Leave a Reply