Home » Intelligent Design » Do oak trees and humans share a common ancestor other than common descent?

Do oak trees and humans share a common ancestor other than common descent?

March 11, 2008 Posted by Galapagos Finch under Intelligent Design
17 Comments

“Not only does the oak tree and homo sapien share 70% identical DNA, the similarity of phenotypical features of the acorn with the adult human is compelling and, indeed, irrefutable,” says Dr. Richard Knuther.

TheBRITES.org

Details at TheBrites.org.

  • Delicious
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feed

17 Responses to Do oak trees and humans share a common ancestor other than common descent?

  1. 1
    FtKMarch 11, 2008 at 7:37 pm

    ROTFLMAO…

  2. 2
    ellijacketMarch 11, 2008 at 7:41 pm

    I am steady as an oak. Little did I know that I owed it all to my phenotypical features.

    Does this stuff ever end? Can it get more wacky? I’m not even an ID guy, I’m a creationist, but at least the ID folks have enough sense to see that things didn’t ‘just happen’!

  3. 3
    Gods iPodMarch 11, 2008 at 7:55 pm

    Nice acorns!!!

    :P

  4. 4
    ApollosMarch 11, 2008 at 8:09 pm

    I can always use a new euphemism.

  5. 5
    bFastMarch 11, 2008 at 9:10 pm

    Hubba Hubba

  6. 6
    alanMarch 11, 2008 at 9:33 pm

    X RATED ACORNS! SHAME!

  7. 7
    Galapagos FinchMarch 11, 2008 at 9:39 pm

    No no no!

    These are swollen lymph nodes!

    What are you thinking!?!

    Gloppy

  8. 8
    MungMarch 11, 2008 at 10:38 pm

    You people are nasty.

    All I saw were eyeballs.

  9. 9
    didymosMarch 11, 2008 at 10:38 pm

    And this crude, mildly (very mildly) amusing parody of evolutionary theory is supposed to establish what exactly?

  10. 10
    bFastMarch 11, 2008 at 10:39 pm

    Finch, you boob.

  11. 11
    ungtssMarch 11, 2008 at 10:52 pm

    Does this stuff ever end? Can it get more wacky? I’m not even an ID guy, I’m a creationist, but at least the ID folks have enough sense to see that things didn’t ‘just happen’!

    I do hope we all realize this was a parody:). Check out the articles on evolution in hell and Dawkins losing the wager with Behe … I can’t figure out what side he’s on.

  12. 12
    ApollosMarch 12, 2008 at 12:30 am

    Parody? It’s homology (not that there’s anything wrong with that). Besides, hasn’t anyone seen Friedrich Jier’s sprout drawings? Very compelling when compared with Haekel’s embryos.

  13. 13
    ApollosMarch 12, 2008 at 12:32 am

    Sorry, *haeckel*

  14. 14
    irreducible_complacencyMarch 12, 2008 at 9:41 am

    I’ll be impressed when involucres magically evolve the ability to grow hair and self-adjust their distance to a heat source.

  15. 15
    Timothy V ReevesMarch 12, 2008 at 1:58 pm

    Rubbish: The brites has been caught concocting evidence yet again. They’re implants.

  16. 16
    Jack GolightlyMarch 13, 2008 at 10:25 am

    Gloppy,
    I see the connection now – swollen lymph nodes that secrete a fluid that happens to be nutritional to the young of the species. Sounds an awful lot like Goldschmidt to me!

  17. 17
    RREMarch 13, 2008 at 9:08 pm

    This is the funniest post ever.

Leave a Reply