Comments on: Darwinism seen as old-fashioned materialism http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/darwinism-seen-as-old-fashioned-materialism/ Serving The Intelligent Design Community Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:17:53 +0000 hourly 1 By: Mats http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/darwinism-seen-as-old-fashioned-materialism/comment-page-1/#comment-144576 Mats Sun, 28 Oct 2007 19:48:39 +0000 http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/darwinism-seen-as-old-fashioned-materialism/#comment-144576 <i>"Thus, while we may still appreciate the <b>role of Darwin in helping scientists wining a upper hand in fighting against the creationists </b>for filling our intellectual void of understanding life’s origin and evolution, we must realize that <b>Darwin’s fetal [sic?] mistakes</b> have also <b>misled science</b> into a<b> dead end</b> of <b>fruitless search </b>for the <b>non-existent</b> last common ancestor (LCA) and some<b> useless constructions</b> of some<b> untruthful universal tree of life </b>(TOL). </i> (Shi Liu of the Eagle Institute of Molecular Medicine in North Carolina) http://www.biology-direct.com/content/2/1/21/comments#284660 “Thus, while we may still appreciate the role of Darwin in helping scientists wining a upper hand in fighting against the creationists for filling our intellectual void of understanding life’s origin and evolution, we must realize that Darwin’s fetal [sic?] mistakes have also misled science into a dead end of fruitless search for the non-existent last common ancestor (LCA) and some useless constructions of some untruthful universal tree of life (TOL).
(Shi Liu of the Eagle Institute of Molecular Medicine in North Carolina)

http://www.biology-direct.com/.....nts#284660

]]> By: shaner74 http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/darwinism-seen-as-old-fashioned-materialism/comment-page-1/#comment-144537 shaner74 Sun, 28 Oct 2007 14:38:28 +0000 http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/darwinism-seen-as-old-fashioned-materialism/#comment-144537 "Fanciful to the extreme, sure, but the growing number of such theories — life comes from the past (Mars, when it was theoretically livable) or future (Tierney) — is one more indication that Darwinism no longer satisfies." I've thought the same thing. No way Darwinism is healthy when "theories" like these are popping up. All it takes is a gander at cellular machinery and unguided, blind watchmaker evolution looks like a heaping pile of... “Fanciful to the extreme, sure, but the growing number of such theories — life comes from the past (Mars, when it was theoretically livable) or future (Tierney) — is one more indication that Darwinism no longer satisfies.”

I’ve thought the same thing. No way Darwinism is healthy when “theories” like these are popping up. All it takes is a gander at cellular machinery and unguided, blind watchmaker evolution looks like a heaping pile of…

]]>