﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Behe-McWhorter Back Online</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/behe-mcwhorter-back-online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/behe-mcwhorter-back-online/</link>
	<description>Serving The Intelligent Design Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:01:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: kairosfocus</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/behe-mcwhorter-back-online/comment-page-4/#comment-332479</link>
		<dc:creator>kairosfocus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 05:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=8335#comment-332479</guid>
		<description>YakkyD

You need to read the material Sternberg has at the linked.

Then, think very, very carefully about where institutional science, government, law enforcement and the civlisation are headed on this track.

(Perhaps a glance at &lt;a href=&quot;http://wikilivres.info/wiki/Nineteen_Eighty-Four&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this book&lt;/a&gt; may help.)

GEM of TKI</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YakkyD</p>
<p>You need to read the material Sternberg has at the linked.</p>
<p>Then, think very, very carefully about where institutional science, government, law enforcement and the civlisation are headed on this track.</p>
<p>(Perhaps a glance at <a href="http://wikilivres.info/wiki/Nineteen_Eighty-Four" rel="nofollow">this book</a> may help.)</p>
<p>GEM of TKI</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: O'Leary</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/behe-mcwhorter-back-online/comment-page-4/#comment-332461</link>
		<dc:creator>O'Leary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 01:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=8335#comment-332461</guid>
		<description>IRQ Conflict 102: I joined the discussion late, but restoring the link was indeed the honourable thing to do, and good for Bloggingheads!

A strict Bloggingheads policy of not removing vlogs is wise because it protects all parties.

One party may be under pressure from various sources to demand the removal of the vlog - but that  creates the impression that he believes he has lost a debate.

How does that help him?

Also, there is no clear way for his supporters to defend his position.

Various parties may have archived the vlog, but discussion then becomes a huge mess, as there is no one single official Bloggingheads link that we reasonably believe no one has tampered with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IRQ Conflict 102: I joined the discussion late, but restoring the link was indeed the honourable thing to do, and good for Bloggingheads!</p>
<p>A strict Bloggingheads policy of not removing vlogs is wise because it protects all parties.</p>
<p>One party may be under pressure from various sources to demand the removal of the vlog &#8211; but that  creates the impression that he believes he has lost a debate.</p>
<p>How does that help him?</p>
<p>Also, there is no clear way for his supporters to defend his position.</p>
<p>Various parties may have archived the vlog, but discussion then becomes a huge mess, as there is no one single official Bloggingheads link that we reasonably believe no one has tampered with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IRQ Conflict</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/behe-mcwhorter-back-online/comment-page-4/#comment-332427</link>
		<dc:creator>IRQ Conflict</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 17:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=8335#comment-332427</guid>
		<description>Heh, BHTV doesn&#039;t want to look biased/bad. Too late. But I&#039;m still glad they re-posted it. It&#039;s really the honorable thing to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, BHTV doesn&#8217;t want to look biased/bad. Too late. But I&#8217;m still glad they re-posted it. It&#8217;s really the honorable thing to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IRQ Conflict</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/behe-mcwhorter-back-online/comment-page-4/#comment-332214</link>
		<dc:creator>IRQ Conflict</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 16:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=8335#comment-332214</guid>
		<description>Sorry Clive. Didn&#039;t see you post till after I made mine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Clive. Didn&#8217;t see you post till after I made mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clive Hayden</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/behe-mcwhorter-back-online/comment-page-4/#comment-332210</link>
		<dc:creator>Clive Hayden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 15:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=8335#comment-332210</guid>
		<description>No more discussion about Muslims.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No more discussion about Muslims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/behe-mcwhorter-back-online/comment-page-4/#comment-332206</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 15:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=8335#comment-332206</guid>
		<description>IRQ,

I have been to muslim countries.

Muslims by far are very decent people.

It is only the very few who do bad things.

Why don&#039;t the moderates speak out?

Two reasons that I can see:

1- They do not want to die

2- It is up to Allah to judge and punish.

But anyway if there are 100 million muslims and 1% are &quot;bad&quot; people, that makes 1 million.

1 million is 1000 people in 1000 cities.

Sure that seems like a lot but in context it isn&#039;t.

Now look at Christians- they fight each other. And they form groups that don&#039;t like different skin colors. 

BTW Islam, Christianity and Judaism trace back to Abraham- IOW they all worship the same &quot;God&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IRQ,</p>
<p>I have been to muslim countries.</p>
<p>Muslims by far are very decent people.</p>
<p>It is only the very few who do bad things.</p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t the moderates speak out?</p>
<p>Two reasons that I can see:</p>
<p>1- They do not want to die</p>
<p>2- It is up to Allah to judge and punish.</p>
<p>But anyway if there are 100 million muslims and 1% are &#8220;bad&#8221; people, that makes 1 million.</p>
<p>1 million is 1000 people in 1000 cities.</p>
<p>Sure that seems like a lot but in context it isn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Now look at Christians- they fight each other. And they form groups that don&#8217;t like different skin colors. </p>
<p>BTW Islam, Christianity and Judaism trace back to Abraham- IOW they all worship the same &#8220;God&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yakky d</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/behe-mcwhorter-back-online/comment-page-4/#comment-332134</link>
		<dc:creator>yakky d</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 05:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=8335#comment-332134</guid>
		<description>IRQ Conflict,
&lt;blockquote&gt;
There are decent people that have been raised as Muslims yes. But by far they are the minority.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
When you say decent Muslims are by far in the minority, about what percentage are you talking about?  Give me a rough estimate. 

Also, to what extent are your views about Muslims determined through person-to-person interaction rather than reports from the media?  Do you have many Muslim friends or coworkers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IRQ Conflict,</p>
<blockquote><p>
There are decent people that have been raised as Muslims yes. But by far they are the minority.
</p></blockquote>
<p>When you say decent Muslims are by far in the minority, about what percentage are you talking about?  Give me a rough estimate. </p>
<p>Also, to what extent are your views about Muslims determined through person-to-person interaction rather than reports from the media?  Do you have many Muslim friends or coworkers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IRQ Conflict</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/behe-mcwhorter-back-online/comment-page-4/#comment-332132</link>
		<dc:creator>IRQ Conflict</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 05:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=8335#comment-332132</guid>
		<description>yakky d,

 There are decent people that have been raised as Muslims yes. But by far they are the minority. Why do you think it is that the so-called &#039;moderate&#039; Muslims rarely if ever cry out at the atrocities committed by adherents to Islam? It&#039;s not rocket science.

 There are things you need to know about true Islam. Here&#039;s but the latest sampling: http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/08/killing_rifqa.html

2Co 11:14  And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. 
2Co 11:15  Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yakky d,</p>
<p> There are decent people that have been raised as Muslims yes. But by far they are the minority. Why do you think it is that the so-called &#8216;moderate&#8217; Muslims rarely if ever cry out at the atrocities committed by adherents to Islam? It&#8217;s not rocket science.</p>
<p> There are things you need to know about true Islam. Here&#8217;s but the latest sampling: <a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/08/killing_rifqa.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.americanthinker.com.....rifqa.html</a></p>
<p>2Co 11:14  And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.<br />
2Co 11:15  Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yakky d</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/behe-mcwhorter-back-online/comment-page-4/#comment-332117</link>
		<dc:creator>yakky d</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 23:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=8335#comment-332117</guid>
		<description>IRQ Conflict,
&lt;blockquote&gt;
Quite like Muslims, “Taqqyia”, Darwinists are more than ready to lie and &lt;del&gt;behead&lt;/del&gt; give the axe to those who insult Darwin.

No wonder the atheist religion prefers islam over Christianity. They have the same god.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
It&#039;s a bit less graphic, but still needs improvement IMHO  :D

On a more serious note, while I&#039;m not a big fan of Islam, I do have a lot of respect for many of the Muslims I have gotten to know over the years.  There&#039;s no need to make these insulting stereotypical statements to support the case for ID.  

lamarck,
&lt;blockquote&gt;
Is there any way we can confirm that Yakky’s actually pro-ID?

Yakky it was a brilliant scheme to pose as a darwinist with underhanded softball after softball, and striking out each time when you’re up to bat.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
So I&#039;m a double-secret-reverse deep cover sock?  Interesting hypothesis!  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IRQ Conflict,</p>
<blockquote><p>
Quite like Muslims, “Taqqyia”, Darwinists are more than ready to lie and <del>behead</del> give the axe to those who insult Darwin.</p>
<p>No wonder the atheist religion prefers islam over Christianity. They have the same god.
</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s a bit less graphic, but still needs improvement IMHO  <img src='http://www.uncommondescent.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>On a more serious note, while I&#8217;m not a big fan of Islam, I do have a lot of respect for many of the Muslims I have gotten to know over the years.  There&#8217;s no need to make these insulting stereotypical statements to support the case for ID.  </p>
<p>lamarck,</p>
<blockquote><p>
Is there any way we can confirm that Yakky’s actually pro-ID?</p>
<p>Yakky it was a brilliant scheme to pose as a darwinist with underhanded softball after softball, and striking out each time when you’re up to bat.
</p></blockquote>
<p>So I&#8217;m a double-secret-reverse deep cover sock?  Interesting hypothesis!  <img src='http://www.uncommondescent.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lamarck</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/behe-mcwhorter-back-online/comment-page-4/#comment-332113</link>
		<dc:creator>lamarck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 22:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=8335#comment-332113</guid>
		<description>Is there any way we can confirm that Yakky&#039;s actually pro-ID?

Yakky it was a brilliant scheme to pose as a darwinist with underhanded softball after softball, and striking out each time when you&#039;re up to bat.

But it&#039;s getting played out. Conspiracy after conspiracy is unearthed and confirmed, making your clever ruse too obvious. 

Come on back over to our side with your other username bro, well done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any way we can confirm that Yakky&#8217;s actually pro-ID?</p>
<p>Yakky it was a brilliant scheme to pose as a darwinist with underhanded softball after softball, and striking out each time when you&#8217;re up to bat.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s getting played out. Conspiracy after conspiracy is unearthed and confirmed, making your clever ruse too obvious. </p>
<p>Come on back over to our side with your other username bro, well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

