Baylor closes ranks, defends Darwin against all lines of evidence
|September 14, 2007||Posted by O'Leary under Intelligent Design|
BaylorÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s move to shut down Prof. Robert MarksÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s exposure of Darwinism as the Enron of biology is a harder line than the institution took seven years ago.
Curiously, the 2000 report on the Polanyi Center (long closed) had actually proclaimed,
” … the committee wishes to make it clear that it considers research on the logical structure of mathematical arguments for intelligent design to have a legitimate claim to a place in current discussions of the relations of religion and the sciences.”
Presumably, Baylor honchos donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t think that any more.
Is that because Bob Marks can actually do it now?
Bill Dembski tells me that the shutdown committee had never suggested that he couldnÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t put such papers on his own site.
Go to BillÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s site right now to see the kind of papers questioning St. DarwinÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s teachings that Baylor welcomes.
Ã‚Â Canadian journalist David Warren defends Mike Behe and offers “boilerplate” responses to Darwinists.
Portuguese language ID controversy blog celebrates 70 000 visitors
O’Leary’s podcast on why the ID controversy shapes up differently in Canada. Also, a link to dozens of polls on related subjects.
Where did terms like intelligent design and Darwinism come from?
New entries to be added to the Encyclopedia on Evolution in the Light of Intelligent Design
Creation science museum opens in Alberta, Canada
Mother Teresa’s dark night of the soul