Comments on: An Open Letter to Karl Giberson http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/an-open-letter-to-karl-giberson/ Serving The Intelligent Design Community Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:47:34 +0000 hourly 1 By: 13atman http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/an-open-letter-to-karl-giberson/comment-page-1/#comment-335954 13atman Thu, 01 Oct 2009 21:30:09 +0000 http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=8890#comment-335954 I thought some here might be interested in this philosophy paper put up at the Evangelical Philosophical Society's blog: "Atheists Against Darwinism: Johnsons' "Wedge" Breaks Through": http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EpsBlog/~3/jGpS_x5R0xM/atheists-against-darwinism.asp I thought some here might be interested in this philosophy paper put up at the Evangelical Philosophical Society’s blog:

“Atheists Against Darwinism: Johnsons’ “Wedge” Breaks Through”:

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r.....winism.asp

]]> By: toc http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/an-open-letter-to-karl-giberson/comment-page-1/#comment-335914 toc Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:14:45 +0000 http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=8890#comment-335914 Their science appears to be getting in the way of their theology; or is it the other way around? It also seems that they form deductive arguments before doing their inductive homework. I read Collins's book and came away with the impression that his Christianity is almost purely existential. His faith in Science clearly controls his rational self, but his presuppositions betray is "rationality," Their science appears to be getting in the way of their theology; or is it the other way around? It also seems that they form deductive arguments before doing their inductive homework. I read Collins’s book and came away with the impression that his Christianity is almost purely existential. His faith in Science clearly controls his rational self, but his presuppositions betray is “rationality,”

]]>