Home
» Intelligent Design » Dover’s done talking intelligent design, but rest of the world isn’t
Dover’s done talking intelligent design, but rest of the world isn’t
| January 15, 2006 | Posted by William Dembski under Intelligent Design |
No end to debate likely:
Dover’s done talking intelligent design, but rest of the world isn’tBy MICHELLE STARR
Daily Record/Sunday NewsJan 15, 2006  If people believed a ruling in federal court would end the national debate about intelligent design, they were wrong.
Judge John E. Jones III’s ruling in December was celebrated by supporters, who called it thorough and impressive, while those who believe intelligent design is science denounced Jones as an activist judge, or even incompetent.
35 Responses to Dover’s done talking intelligent design, but rest of the world isn’t
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
I wasn’t trying to argue anything, Red Reader, I am merely pointing out that the discussion of UD outside of this site has really taken notice of the way comments are moderated, just like Neotoma pointed out with the shark analogy.
I see that I have not been banned, but I could have sworn that yesterday my ‘level’ was 1, and it counted posts, but now I see 0 and 0 for both of them. Was it that server glitch? If it is true that my level has been altered so that no one else may read my posts then it is practically the same as banning. I would have asked someone by email about this if there were any email addresses or URL’s in the profiles of the administrators, so I guess this is my only way of asking.
Oh, if anyone wants to send me an email about my last post, you can do so at [email protected].
woctor informs me that my comments are visible, ok then the 0′s don’t seem to matter. I guess I’m unable to delete my earlier posts…
The content is 0.
“Clergy who support evolution took a stand last fall. Ten thousand of them, including the Rev. Deborah Volker of the Grace Evangelical Lutheran Church of York, signed a letter affirming their support. Volker doesn’t believe in a literal interpretation of the Bible, so she sees no conflict.â€Â
This just sounds like more Darwinian propaganda. I don’t believe it for a second.
Comment by Boesman  January 15, 2006 @ 9:29 pm
LOL. Believe whatever you wish.
It might be a good idea to read the statement the clerics signed though (BTW. They were all clerics, not congregation members)
Then read the statement the 400 scientists signed.
One is far more clear than the other. Guess which.