Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Planetary Habitability Index: Conjuring life on other planets

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

From “Planets’ life-hosting potential ranked” (CBC News, Nov 24, 2011), we learn,

Plugging in parameters such as a planet’s mass, radius, and average temperature generates a series of measures in the Earth Similarity Index, which “provides a quick screening tool with which to detect exoplanets most similar to Earth,” said Dirk Schulze-Makuch, an astrobiologist at Washington State University in Pullman, Wash., in a statement.

He added that scientists know empirically that Earth-like conditions can support life.

Amazing! How did they figure that out?!!

But the researchers noted that some conditions that aren’t Earth-like — such as those found in oily lakes on Titan, a moon of Saturn — could theoretically also be conducive to life — albeit not the kind we are most familiar with.

So how much weight should be given to “theoretically” vs., um, biomass?

The proposed Planetary Habitability Index suggests that we should look for the stuff we find on Earth with the caveat that maybe that stuff’s not necessary after all.

This sentence tells us pretty much everything:

The only known planet or moon either inside or outside our solar system that is truly “Earth-like” using the Earth Similarity Index was found to be Gliese 581g, a planet announced discovered in 2010 that other researchers have since suggested does not exist, based on a reanalysis of the data.

You really have to read the rest for yourself here.

Surely, astrobiology currently meets Lakatos’ criteria for a degenerate research program. If it were a healthy field, they’d be far more content to wait for actual data.

No wonder the article is unbylined. Thoughts?

Comments
Here, we suspected as much. Mother Earth is definitely the Do-Yer-OWN-Laundry type.News
November 26, 2011
November
11
Nov
26
26
2011
06:01 PM
6
06
01
PM
PDT
Hi JD, Plate tectonics are required for carbon recycling and is also an indication of a required molten and rotating core, which in turn is required to produce a magnetic field- given the molten core has enough iron. They can also be used to study the earth as in they send sound waves through it and we can then measure those waves to determine density. You can read all about that in "The Privileged Planet". The "problem" is much of our mineral wealth can be found where the plates meet. The motion brings it up and we build around it so we can haz it. So I guess the "evil" is mother earth doesn't "give it up" for nuthin'.Joe
November 26, 2011
November
11
Nov
26
26
2011
05:59 PM
5
05
59
PM
PDT
I came across this article recently quoting the chairman of ESA’s scientific advisory committee stating that plate tectonics are necessary for life to form. Remember that next time you get earthquakes as an example of so-called 'natural evil'. LinkJD Curtis
November 26, 2011
November
11
Nov
26
26
2011
05:25 PM
5
05
25
PM
PDT

Leave a Reply