DeepDesign:
Regularity is found at every level in the known universe. We call it a Cosmos not Chaos.

have you looked up the word “stochastic”? apparent complex sequences (even mathematical sets) will often arise in large enough random processes (and the universe is apparently the largest possible ongoing process we can see).
out of interest (and this is completely hypothetical of course), would a universe in which there was absolutely no possible observable regularity indicate design?

But would a Godel Universe support ID? What exactly did Godel believe about God? I know he believed in an afterlife.

Even if it was true that Dawkins was lied to (I don’t actually buy this claim, but for the sake of argument). He has supposedly been “taken in” by a ruse like this before. The first time is excusable but what is his excuse this time ?

And besides, AFAICS (seeing as the movie has yet to open in Australia and I haven’t had a chance to see it yet) it isn’t like his position has been misrepresented in any way. Dawkins has not claimed that anywhere.

If he doesn’t like everybody knowing he is a fundamentally clueless anti-religious bigot, perhaps he should shut his pie whole and stop confirming it for everyone.

If he wants to insist on making an arse of himself I don’t see why anybody is obligated to cover for him.

The only issue is that, while Evolution Theory has been repeatedly supported by scientific observation, whereas Intelligent Design theory has not. There have been no rigorous scientific tests that ID has stood up to.

Do you mean to be serious? Or are you just parroting “Big Science” as briefly summarized in Expelled? Or have you even seen it?
Have you read any of the evidence for ID? Can you seriously address the arguments in Michael Behe’s Darwin’s Black Box, and Limits to Evolution,
Dembski & Wells, The Design of Life
Dembski, No Free Lunch.
(For the light reading.)
e.g., See
The Essential Intelligent Design Bibliography

For serious articles see:
http://www.discovery.org/a/2177” rel=”nofollow”>Intelligent Design: The Origin of Biological Information and the Higher Taxonomic Categories By: Stephen C. Meyer, Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington
May 18, 2007

William Dembski, The Design Inference.

Do you actively support or are you in a position to support publication of ID research or articles, as in Stephen Myers article?

Only that which can be observed and tested should be categorized as “Science”

Will you kindly show us where the Origin Of Life has been observed and tested?
How about any “Macroevolution” from one species to another, or one genus to another, or on phyla to another etc.?

When considering “Science” you have to distinguish between laboratory repeatability vs the “science” of interpreting historical or prehistorical events. etc. See Stephen Meyer The Scientific Status of Intelligent Design: The Methodological Equivalence of Naturalistic and Non-Naturalistic Origins Theories, By: Stephen C. Meyer, Science and Evidence for Design in the Universe (Ignatius Press) November 13, 2005

PS Both Evolution and Intelligent Design have major philosophical IMPLICATIONS. Do not confuse the implications with the science.

Seriously, what kind of moron gets suckered like that twice ?

a moron who has been lied to.

realise that everyone in your field says you’re wrong, you’re either in a vastly elaborate, evil, arbitrary Dan-Brown-esque conspiracy theory (this is called paranoia, folks) – or, chances are you are actually wrong.

Expelledthemovie was not registered “long in advance” of the interviews. It was registered a month in advance of when Myers, Scott, and Dawkins were first contacted by the producers.

Whether or not it was still a “working title” (one of two of more titles under consideration) at that time is anyone’s guess. “Crossroads” was never registered in and of itself but was rather a page inside Rampant Films’ website and it had been that way indeed “long before” expelledthemovie was registered. The producers at Premise, at least some of them, were also producers at Rampant Films. How the project got switched from Rampant to Premise is just as likely (moreso IMO) to be business related as it was something designed to hide the nature of the film.