﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New Pope and ID</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uncommondescent.com/evolution/the-new-pope-and-id/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/evolution/the-new-pope-and-id/</link>
	<description>Serving The Intelligent Design Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:29:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: The Panda's Thumb</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/evolution/the-new-pope-and-id/comment-page-1/#comment-1814</link>
		<dc:creator>The Panda's Thumb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 17:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/index.php/archives/13#comment-1814</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Victim of the Wedge?&lt;/strong&gt;

The New York Times has a full story today on Cardinal Sch&#246;nborn&#8217;s op-ed: Leading Cardinal Redefines Church&#8217;s View on Evolution.&#160; According to the story the op-ed was written with the urging of the Discovery Institute&#8217;s Mark ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Victim of the Wedge?</strong></p>
<p>The New York Times has a full story today on Cardinal Sch&ouml;nborn&#8217;s op-ed: Leading Cardinal Redefines Church&#8217;s View on Evolution.&nbsp; According to the story the op-ed was written with the urging of the Discovery Institute&#8217;s Mark &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Buckingham Inquirer &#187; Intelligent Design Tomfoolery III</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/evolution/the-new-pope-and-id/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>The Buckingham Inquirer &#187; Intelligent Design Tomfoolery III</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 05:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/index.php/archives/13#comment-66</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#8217;s not surprising that atheists like P.Z. Meyers don&#8217;t understand faith, but the ignorance of self-proclaimed Christian scientists like William Dembski about both science an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s not surprising that atheists like P.Z. Meyers don&#8217;t understand faith, but the ignorance of self-proclaimed Christian scientists like William Dembski about both science an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Buckingham Inquirer &#187; Intelligent Design Tomfoolery III</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/evolution/the-new-pope-and-id/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>The Buckingham Inquirer &#187; Intelligent Design Tomfoolery III</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 05:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/index.php/archives/13#comment-65</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#8217;s not surprising that atheists like P.Z. Meyers don&#8217;t understand faith, but the ignorance of self-proclaimed Christian scientists like William Dembski about both science an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s not surprising that atheists like P.Z. Meyers don&#8217;t understand faith, but the ignorance of self-proclaimed Christian scientists like William Dembski about both science an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: debunkers.org</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/evolution/the-new-pope-and-id/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>debunkers.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 17:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/index.php/archives/13#comment-24</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Why Intelligent Design is Bad&lt;/strong&gt;

William Dembski points out, indavertantly, why intelligent design (ID) is bad.

I&#8217;m predicting that Bush and Benedict XVI will play much the same role in the distintegration of evolution (i.e., the ateleological materialistic form of it that cu...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Why Intelligent Design is Bad</strong></p>
<p>William Dembski points out, indavertantly, why intelligent design (ID) is bad.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m predicting that Bush and Benedict XVI will play much the same role in the distintegration of evolution (i.e., the ateleological materialistic form of it that cu&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abnormal Interests</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/evolution/the-new-pope-and-id/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Abnormal Interests</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 19:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/index.php/archives/13#comment-21</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Leveraging the New Pope to Advance Intelligent Design Creationism&lt;/strong&gt;

Those you who read these rambles regularly know that I think PZ Myers at Pharyngula has about the best blog on the web. However, I think he may have gone a little beyond the evidence today. He has a very...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Leveraging the New Pope to Advance Intelligent Design Creationism</strong></p>
<p>Those you who read these rambles regularly know that I think PZ Myers at Pharyngula has about the best blog on the web. However, I think he may have gone a little beyond the evidence today. He has a very&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notes in Samsara</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/evolution/the-new-pope-and-id/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Notes in Samsara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 19:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/index.php/archives/13#comment-19</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Wishful Thinking...&lt;/strong&gt;

the term &quot;chance&quot; when used in a technical, mathematical sense is simply a phenomenological statement; no underlying &quot;cause&quot; is either implied or dismissed. Thus there is no tension between what Ratzinger says here and what John Paull II said on ev...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Wishful Thinking&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>the term &#8220;chance&#8221; when used in a technical, mathematical sense is simply a phenomenological statement; no underlying &#8220;cause&#8221; is either implied or dismissed. Thus there is no tension between what Ratzinger says here and what John Paull II said on ev&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stranger fruit</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/evolution/the-new-pope-and-id/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>stranger fruit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/index.php/archives/13#comment-18</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;More on Ratzinger and Evolution&lt;/strong&gt;

I forgot to mention that the recent (2004) International Theological Commission report &quot;Communion and Stewardship: Human Persons Created in the Image of God&quot; (link to the Vatican copy) was written for Ratzinger and subsequently approved for publicati...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>More on Ratzinger and Evolution</strong></p>
<p>I forgot to mention that the recent (2004) International Theological Commission report &#8220;Communion and Stewardship: Human Persons Created in the Image of God&#8221; (link to the Vatican copy) was written for Ratzinger and subsequently approved for publicati&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stranger fruit</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/evolution/the-new-pope-and-id/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>stranger fruit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2005 04:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/index.php/archives/13#comment-16</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The (new) Pope and ID&lt;/strong&gt;

I was no fan of Ratzinger as a Cardinal, and have little expectations of him as Benedict XVI. However, it seems Bill Dembski thinks that Benedict will sign on the line for ID. Witness:
[W]e can expect Benedict XVI to single out intelligent design for s...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The (new) Pope and ID</strong></p>
<p>I was no fan of Ratzinger as a Cardinal, and have little expectations of him as Benedict XVI. However, it seems Bill Dembski thinks that Benedict will sign on the line for ID. Witness:<br />
[W]e can expect Benedict XVI to single out intelligent design for s&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

