The need for “creation science”?!
|April 25, 2005||Posted by William Dembski under Evolution|
Who wrote the following:
Ã¢â‚¬Å“How can a theory of evolution that purports to explain how creatures with trillions of cells arose from unicellular beginnings lost in the mists of pre-Cambrian time be taken seriously if all it tells us is that differential rates of destruction can alter the genetic composition of populations? How are the new variants that natural selection spreads through populations created in the first place? Although the phrase Ã¢â‚¬Ëœcreation scienceÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ carries disreputable connotations because of its frequent use by some religious fundamentalists, we truly need some Ã¢â‚¬Ëœcreation scienceÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ (in the other sense of that phrase) as a major component of evolutionary theory.Ã¢â‚¬Â
A. A creation scientist.
B. An ID proponent.
C. A mainstream biologist who is neither a creation scientist nor an ID proponent.
For the answer, go here.