Sign me up for the next Dawkins cruise
| September 9, 2005 | Posted by William Dembski under Darwinism, Evolution |
Thanks Bombadill for alerting me to this photo (that’s Richard Dawkins on the left, Steve Aldrich on the right). To view all the festivities of the 2004 Center for Inquiry cruise, go here.
Imagine someone putting a gun to your head and forcing you to go on this cruise. Imagine you died and woke up in hell. But I repeat myself.
41 Responses to Sign me up for the next Dawkins cruise
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
For so much defense put up about how you are not here to discuss religion, one has to wonder exactly how you explain bringing up Christianity in the first place.
(personally, I find his message to be largely abhorrent)
Says a lot about you doesn’t it?
Just for fun:
http://www.tektonics.org/parody/fundyath.html
http://www.tektonics.org/guest/300proof.html
God must have a sense of humor, after all, he gave us “DICK”
.
Well, Dave, while Hookflash is apparently new to this blog (or at least I haven’t noticed his name before) you’ve got to admit that lately most of your comments have been of the “A lovely couple of GIRLY MEN!” caliber and not anything like your more serious discussions. But, yeah, like it’s easy to say anything constructive in a topic like this…
Bill says Dawkins is a villain. I say Dawkins is a girly man. Can both be simultaneously true?
“Bill says Dawkins is a villain. I say Dawkins is a girly man. Can both be simultaneously true?”
If Disney films are any indication, most villains evolved from girly men. The resulting popular characters are, in fact, Girly-Villian-Men. It is important to note that there is no evidence these GVM evolved at all. Rather, they were designed by an intelligent “designer” for a purpose. Perhaps even if Dawkins is a GVM, it is so only because he was designed that way for a purpose. (No, I’m not suggesting Dawkins was “designed” by the folks at Disney, but judging by the comments on this blog he may fit the stereotype quite well.)
Thank God we were designed with a sense of humor…
For the record, I seem to recall DaveScot claiming to be a hardcore agnostic, believing that all CSI in the universe arose materialistically. If that is false, then I apologize. If it is true, however, I am interested in seeing how he reconciles his view with Dembski’s work in NFL.
JaredL
I don’t claim to know how CSI arose.
Your apology is accepted.
That’s not a T-shirt. It’s a sun dress.
Nostrowski – Good one! LOL
I just registered to tell you:
Atheists for Jesus is a legitimate organization. (Or at least it was – the web site seems to be down.) It does not mock Christianity – it honors the moral value of Jesus’ teaching even for those without a belief in the supernatural. The title is ironic, but the motivation is sincere.
Also Richard Dawkins is married to a beautiful blond actress.
And Arnold S. is sinking in the polls.
Dawkins third and current wife, Lala Ward, wasn’t born a blond. You seem to be intimating that girly men can’t have attractive wives. This is not true in the short run. Girly men usually can’t keep attractive wives for the long haul because the novelty for the woman of having a girlfriend/husband combo eventually wears off. Lala being Dawkins’ third wife is illustrative.
Arnold S. has been remarkably constant in opinion polls and has risen in positive sentiment by a few percentage points since his election. He’d be a presidential contender in 2008 if not for being a naturalized citizen thus not constitutionally qualified to become president. One might also note he’s been married just once, is still married, about to celebrate his 20th wedding anniversary, and has 4 children.