﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reality Moment: The Burden of Proof</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uncommondescent.com/evolution/reality-moment-the-burden-of-proof/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/evolution/reality-moment-the-burden-of-proof/</link>
	<description>Serving The Intelligent Design Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:22:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Abnormal Interests</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/evolution/reality-moment-the-burden-of-proof/comment-page-1/#comment-5069</link>
		<dc:creator>Abnormal Interests</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2005 22:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=265#comment-5069</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Relativism:  for Creationists, Sometimes it&#039;s Good and Sometimes it&#039;s Bad&lt;/strong&gt;

The Baptist Press carried an article, &quot;Evolution &amp; Christianity &#039;incompatible,&#039; Mohler says in NPR forum&quot; in its August 24th online edition. Here is the heart of Mohler&#039;s thesis: Moreover, evolutionary theory stands at the base of moral relativism...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Relativism:  for Creationists, Sometimes it&#8217;s Good and Sometimes it&#8217;s Bad</strong></p>
<p>The Baptist Press carried an article, &#8220;Evolution &amp; Christianity &#8216;incompatible,&#8217; Mohler says in NPR forum&#8221; in its August 24th online edition. Here is the heart of Mohler&#8217;s thesis: Moreover, evolutionary theory stands at the base of moral relativism&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arensb</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/evolution/reality-moment-the-burden-of-proof/comment-page-1/#comment-5066</link>
		<dc:creator>arensb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2005 16:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=265#comment-5066</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Reality moment, everyone: In this postmodern age, there is no universally binding standard for who bears the burden of proof. Rather, who bears the burden of proof depends on who can most deftly shift the burden of proof or, alternatively, who is unable to deflect that burden&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I don&#039;t understand. Why isn&#039;t it automatically up to ID proponents to demonstrate ID?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Reality moment, everyone: In this postmodern age, there is no universally binding standard for who bears the burden of proof. Rather, who bears the burden of proof depends on who can most deftly shift the burden of proof or, alternatively, who is unable to deflect that burden</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t understand. Why isn&#8217;t it automatically up to ID proponents to demonstrate ID?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveScot</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/evolution/reality-moment-the-burden-of-proof/comment-page-1/#comment-4803</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveScot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2005 06:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=265#comment-4803</guid>
		<description>Et tu, Brute? ;-)

http://www.azstarnet.com/sn/politics/90069

&#124;snip&#124;

On Tuesday, though, he sided with the president on two issues that have made headlines recently: teaching intelligent design in schools and Cindy Sheehan, the grieving mother who has come to personify the anti-war movement. 
 
McCain told the Star that, like Bush, he believes &quot;all points of view&quot; should be available to students studying the origins of mankind. 
 
The theory of intelligent design says life is too complex to have developed through evolution, and that a higher power must have had a hand in guiding it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Et tu, Brute? <img src='http://www.uncommondescent.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.azstarnet.com/sn/politics/90069" rel="nofollow">http://www.azstarnet.com/sn/politics/90069</a></p>
<p>|snip|</p>
<p>On Tuesday, though, he sided with the president on two issues that have made headlines recently: teaching intelligent design in schools and Cindy Sheehan, the grieving mother who has come to personify the anti-war movement. </p>
<p>McCain told the Star that, like Bush, he believes &#8220;all points of view&#8221; should be available to students studying the origins of mankind. </p>
<p>The theory of intelligent design says life is too complex to have developed through evolution, and that a higher power must have had a hand in guiding it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnLiljegren</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/evolution/reality-moment-the-burden-of-proof/comment-page-1/#comment-4799</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnLiljegren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2005 05:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=265#comment-4799</guid>
		<description>As to burden of proof, why isn&#039;t the burden on any advocate of any theory?  The burden of proof is on those who advocate the evolution theory, and likewise it&#039;s on those who advocate ID.  It is absurd for the Darwinists to suggest that their theory is correct [regardless of the state of supporting evidence] until the DI folks surmount some abstract burden of proving ID.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As to burden of proof, why isn&#8217;t the burden on any advocate of any theory?  The burden of proof is on those who advocate the evolution theory, and likewise it&#8217;s on those who advocate ID.  It is absurd for the Darwinists to suggest that their theory is correct [regardless of the state of supporting evidence] until the DI folks surmount some abstract burden of proving ID.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

