Uncommon Descent Serving The Intelligent Design Community

Mammoths mated beyond species boundaries

Share
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email
mammoths/painting c. AMNH

DNA proves it, say researchers. From ScienceDaily:

New research examining the DNA of North American mammoths challenges the way we categorize a species. Several species of mammoth are thought to have roamed across the North American continent. The new study results show that while mammoths clearly evolved differences in their physical appearance to deal with different environments, it did not prohibit them from cross-breeding and producing healthy offspring. Paper. (public access) – Dan Fisher et al. Mammuthus Population Dynamics in Late Pleistocene North America: Divergence, Phylogeography and Introgression. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, April 2016 DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2016.00042

A species can be defined as a group of similar animals that can successfully breed and produce fertile offspring. By using differences in the size and shape of their fossilized teeth, a number of North American mammoth species have been identified. But, some scientists are not confident this method of species categorization tells the whole story.

“Species boundaries can be very blurry. We might find differences in features of the teeth or skeleton that closely correspond to what we think are real species boundaries. But other features may not correspond to those boundaries, suggesting that what we formerly regarded as separate species are in fact not at all,” explains Hendrik Poinar, a Professor at McMaster University in Canada…

So, while mammoths clearly evolved differences in their physical appearance to deal with different environments, it did not prohibit them from cross-breeding and producing healthy offspring. More.

Determining what species are is coming to seem more and more like staking out a land claim on a snowbank.

Re speciation in particular: It’s no longer enough to just put enquirers down by saying “Everyone knows that the concept of speciation has been a mess for centuries!”

As an answer, it’s right up there in flashing neon lights with “Everyone knows that the cops in this town have been psycho for decades!”

No wonder even Templeton is rethinking evolution, as it is propounded and taught

The cause of the mammoths’ extinction remains a mystery the authors say.

See also: “Speciation” means what exactly? No one can define it but it is the basis of Darwinian evolution. ”

and

Templeton rethinking evolution, looking for non-Darwin solutions

Follow UD News at Twitter!

Comments
mahuna: Matings that produce STERILE hybrids suggest that Nature has found the boundary between 2 species. Darwin noted "sterility in degree". In Origin of Species, he used varieties of tobacco plants as one of many examples.Zachriel
April 23, 2016
April
04
Apr
23
23
2016
06:59 AM
6
06
59
AM
PDT
Then people must be one species despite differences in looks greater then other creatures who can';t breed fertile offspring!! This has come up before. I say nature doesn't recognize species. only segregated population groups . Whatever the mechanisms that make these segregated population groups look different has no relevance to whether they can breed with each other anymore. A group defined because it can't breed with their cousins as a species might look very alike while groups looking unlike can breed. people are case in point. In short the reproduction walls created is unrelated to the other influences that affect creatures looks. Its irrelevant to nature if creatures can breed anymore. It is relevant if they don't look the same. Marsupial wolves are just placental wolves with pouches even if they could not of bred together. by the way looking at teeth is a waste of time. All the mammoths were one type. Any changes were quick and unlikely to stop interbreeding. The mammoths went the way of all mega giants by the warming/drying of the the northern areas on earth. Probably suddenly.Robert Byers
April 22, 2016
April
04
Apr
22
22
2016
08:34 PM
8
08
34
PM
PDT
"A species can be defined as a group of similar animals that can successfully breed and produce fertile offspring." Emphasis on the FERTILE offspring. Matings that produce STERILE hybrids suggest that Nature has found the boundary between 2 species. Humans can of course profitably produce sterile hybrids for specific human goals (um, they LOOK cute). Luther Burbank, the master of hybridizing plants, was a well known critic of Darwin's "evolution" theory.mahuna
April 22, 2016
April
04
Apr
22
22
2016
03:23 PM
3
03
23
PM
PDT
News: Determining what species are is coming to seem more and more like staking out a land claim on a snowbank. Darwin pointed to "sterility in degree" as evidence supporting evolutionary theory. Species are not necessarily distinct entities, but having evolved from a common ancestor, the process of reproductive isolation may occur over time. Indiana Effigy: Calling them different species is as much due to the human desire to categorize things into specific categories. There is a "clumping" of organisms such that they tend to retain distinctive features.Zachriel
April 22, 2016
April
04
Apr
22
22
2016
10:51 AM
10
10
51
AM
PDT
Re speciation in particular: It’s no longer enough to just put enquirers down by saying “Everyone knows that the concept of speciation has been a mess for centuries!” As an answer, it’s right up there in flashing neon lights with “Everyone knows that the cops in this town have been psycho for decades!”
Yeah, it's the same with the weather... everyone complains about it, but no one does anything about it!goodusername
April 22, 2016
April
04
Apr
22
22
2016
07:58 AM
7
07
58
AM
PDT
"Determining what species are is coming to seem more and more like staking out a land claim on a snowbank." You seem to think that this is surprising. We have always known that the distinction between what we call species is blurred for many species. Tigers can breed with loans. Horses with Donkeys. Polar bears with Grizzly bears. Calling them different species is as much due to the human desire to categorize things into specific categories.Indiana Effigy
April 22, 2016
April
04
Apr
22
22
2016
07:33 AM
7
07
33
AM
PDT

Leave a Reply