﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JW Montgomery weighs in against Orr</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uncommondescent.com/evolution/jw-montgomery-weighs-in-against-orr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/evolution/jw-montgomery-weighs-in-against-orr/</link>
	<description>Serving The Intelligent Design Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:01:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: centuri0n</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/evolution/jw-montgomery-weighs-in-against-orr/comment-page-1/#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator>centuri0n</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2005 13:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/index.php/archives/109#comment-533</guid>
		<description>I am always amazed at the places the &quot;if it walks like a duck ...&quot; analogy comes up -- and I mean at what levels of discourse.  That&#039;s not saying, &quot;if you don&#039;t use big words, you must not be very smart&quot; (because I think that smart people ought to be able to express themselves in precise but uncomplicated language) but it is saying that it is very instructive to see how the most basic epistemological problems can be exposed by an axiom whose author is anonymous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am always amazed at the places the &#8220;if it walks like a duck &#8230;&#8221; analogy comes up &#8212; and I mean at what levels of discourse.  That&#8217;s not saying, &#8220;if you don&#8217;t use big words, you must not be very smart&#8221; (because I think that smart people ought to be able to express themselves in precise but uncomplicated language) but it is saying that it is very instructive to see how the most basic epistemological problems can be exposed by an axiom whose author is anonymous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yellow fatty bean</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/evolution/jw-montgomery-weighs-in-against-orr/comment-page-1/#comment-529</link>
		<dc:creator>yellow fatty bean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 20:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/index.php/archives/109#comment-529</guid>
		<description>Are there any actual publications in peer-reviewed journals that prove or disprove any testable hypothesis put forth by ID?

[Yes, go to www.designinference.com and look at the IDFAQ there (2003) -- that list has increased since. --WmAD]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are there any actual publications in peer-reviewed journals that prove or disprove any testable hypothesis put forth by ID?</p>
<p>[Yes, go to <a href="http://www.designinference.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.designinference.com</a> and look at the IDFAQ there (2003) -- that list has increased since. --WmAD]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

