If cancers can be a newly evolved species, something is wrong with the concept of “newly evolved.”
|July 30, 2011||Posted by News under Darwinism, Evolution|
At ScienceDaily (July 27, 2011), we are asked to consider this, “Are Cancers Newly Evolved Species?”:
In a paper published in the July 1 issue of the journal Cell Cycle, Duesberg and UC Berkeley colleagues describe their theory that carcinogenesis — the generation of cancer — is just another form of speciation, the evolution of new species
The idea that cancer formation is akin to the evolution of a new species is not new, with various biologists hinting at it in the late 20th century. Evolutionary biologist Julian S. Huxley wrote in 1956 that “Once the neoplastic process has crossed the threshold of autonomy, the resultant tumor can be logically regarded as a new biologic species ….”
Last year, Dr. Mark Vincent of the London Regional Cancer Program and University of Western Ontario argued in the journal Evolution that carcinogenesis and the clonal evolution of cancer cells are speciation events in the strict Darwinian sense.
Duesberg has a history with respect to the AIDS virus. We knew we’d heard the name somewhere.