﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: American Society of Agronomy &#8212; What Happened to Your Online Poll?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uncommondescent.com/evolution/american-society-of-agronomy-what-happened-to-your-online-poll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/evolution/american-society-of-agronomy-what-happened-to-your-online-poll/</link>
	<description>Serving The Intelligent Design Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:45:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Abnormal Interests</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/evolution/american-society-of-agronomy-what-happened-to-your-online-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Abnormal Interests</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 03:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/index.php/archives/10#comment-63</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;A Marketing Plan for Biology: Part 2 - the Market&lt;/strong&gt;

If you want to read Part 1, follow this link. Before any marketing plan can be development, a little market research is in order. We need to know what we are up against and what are reasonable marketing goals. Normally...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A Marketing Plan for Biology: Part 2 &#8211; the Market</strong></p>
<p>If you want to read Part 1, follow this link. Before any marketing plan can be development, a little market research is in order. We need to know what we are up against and what are reasonable marketing goals. Normally&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveScot</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/evolution/american-society-of-agronomy-what-happened-to-your-online-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveScot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2005 08:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/index.php/archives/10#comment-13</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see how any honest, intelligent person who has examined the empirical evidence
in support of the of the neo-Darwinian narrative can support teaching it to the exclusion
of all else.  Therefore I&#039;m not at all surprised by the Agronomy poll.  Then again these
are basically farmers and they know manure when they see it.  Perhaps that&#039;s what separates
them from generic AAAS members.

  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see how any honest, intelligent person who has examined the empirical evidence<br />
in support of the of the neo-Darwinian narrative can support teaching it to the exclusion<br />
of all else.  Therefore I&#8217;m not at all surprised by the Agronomy poll.  Then again these<br />
are basically farmers and they know manure when they see it.  Perhaps that&#8217;s what separates<br />
them from generic AAAS members.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel512</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/evolution/american-society-of-agronomy-what-happened-to-your-online-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel512</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2005 19:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/index.php/archives/10#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Regarding DembskiÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s comment about ASA I decided to look at its webpage by myself and instead I found an interesting comment with the next title Ã¢â‚¬Å“Plants Defy MendelÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s Inheritance Laws,Ã¢â‚¬Â so following the link it resulted on the next part of the mentioned title: Ã¢â‚¬Å“may prompt textbook changes.Ã¢â‚¬Â  Taking into account the results on research it seems a bit intuitive to understand those of the poll.   The note starts this way: Ã¢â‚¬Å“Contrary to inheritance laws the scientific world has accepted for more than 100 years, some plants revert to normal traits carried by their grandparents, bypassing genetic abnormalities carried by both parents.Ã¢â‚¬Â   Ooops. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding DembskiÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s comment about ASA I decided to look at its webpage by myself and instead I found an interesting comment with the next title Ã¢â‚¬Å“Plants Defy MendelÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s Inheritance Laws,Ã¢â‚¬Â so following the link it resulted on the next part of the mentioned title: Ã¢â‚¬Å“may prompt textbook changes.Ã¢â‚¬Â  Taking into account the results on research it seems a bit intuitive to understand those of the poll.   The note starts this way: Ã¢â‚¬Å“Contrary to inheritance laws the scientific world has accepted for more than 100 years, some plants revert to normal traits carried by their grandparents, bypassing genetic abnormalities carried by both parents.Ã¢â‚¬Â   Ooops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

