Comments on: O’Reilly: Dawkins’ evolution only is fascism http://www.uncommondescent.com/education/oreilly-dawkins-evolution-only-is-fascism/ Serving The Intelligent Design Community Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:02:58 +0000 hourly 1 By: Joseph http://www.uncommondescent.com/education/oreilly-dawkins-evolution-only-is-fascism/comment-page-1/#comment-337274 Joseph Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:08:32 +0000 http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=9076#comment-337274 "Evidence" as in what is the <i>evidence</i> our existence is due to undirected/ non-targeted processes? What about it Graham 1- any evidence for the anti-ID position? “Evidence” as in what is the evidence our existence is due to undirected/ non-targeted processes?

What about it Graham 1- any evidence for the anti-ID position?

]]> By: DLH http://www.uncommondescent.com/education/oreilly-dawkins-evolution-only-is-fascism/comment-page-1/#comment-337203 DLH Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:44:50 +0000 http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=9076#comment-337203 Granted Now can "evidence" be "seen" or acknowledged given an <i>a priori</i> materialistic assumption? Or is the validity of "evidence" dependent on the observer? Granted

Now can “evidence” be “seen” or acknowledged given an a priori materialistic assumption? Or is the validity of “evidence” dependent on the observer?

]]> By: Graham1 http://www.uncommondescent.com/education/oreilly-dawkins-evolution-only-is-fascism/comment-page-1/#comment-337165 Graham1 Tue, 13 Oct 2009 06:38:52 +0000 http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=9076#comment-337165 I think the single answer to all the above questions is in 1 word: <b>evidence</b> I think the single answer to all the above questions is in 1 word: evidence

]]>