Ah, tolerance!: “You have betrayed Atheism. Go over to the other side and die.”
|March 6, 2012||Posted by News under Darwinism, Culture, Atheism|
In “The God Wars” (New Statesman, February 28, 2012), Bryan Appleyard says a lot of things we say ourselves about new atheism: That it is an intolerant cult (and we would say, in consequence, out of step with traditional liberal values). Appleyard muses on how fellow atheist de Botton ended up on the receiving end of that cult’s reeducation program:
De Botton is the most recent and, consequently, the most shocked victim. He has just produced a book, Religion for Atheists: a Non-Believer’s Guide to the Uses of Religion, mildly suggesting that atheists like himself have much to learn from religion and that, in fact, religion is too important to be left to believers. He has also proposed an atheists’ temple, a place where non-believers can partake of the consolations of silence and meditation.
This has been enough to bring the full force of a neo-atheist fatwa crashing down on his head. The temple idea in particular made them reach for their best books of curses.
At least the curse in the headline above doesn’t threaten violence. Unlike some other curses, Appleyard says. He offers some taxonomy hints on the new atheism:
Atheism is just one-third of this exotic ideological cocktail. Secularism, the political wing of the movement, is another third. Neo-atheists often assume that the two are the same thing; in fact, atheism is a metaphysical position and secularism is a view of how society should be organised. So a Christian can easily be a secularist – indeed, even Christ was being one when he said, “Render unto Caesar” – and an atheist can be anti-secularist if he happens to believe that religious views should be taken into account. But, in some muddled way, the two ideas have been combined by the cultists.
The third leg of neo-atheism is Darwinism, the AK-47 of neo-atheist shock troops. Alone among scientists, and perhaps because of the enormous influence of Richard Dawkins, Darwin has been embraced as the final conclusive proof not only that God does not exist but also that religion as a whole is a uniquely dangerous threat to scientific rationality.
The new atheist cult’s blind Darwinism is vividly illustrated by the following episode:
It was in the midst of this that Fodor and the cognitive scientist Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini published What Darwin Got Wrong, a highly sophisticated analysis of Darwinian thought which concluded that the theory of natural selection could not be stated coherently. All hell broke loose. Such was the abuse that Fodor vowed never to read a blog again. Myers the provocateur announced that he had no intention of reading the book but spent 3,000 words trashing it anyway, a remarkably frank statement of intellectual tyranny.
Fodor now chuckles at the memory. “I said we should write back saying we had no intention of reading his review but we thought it was all wrong anyway.”
(The fact that new atheists fanatically embrace Darwinism as their creation story is only one reason for doubting the doctrine. There are much better ones.)
See also: Interview: Atheist Alain de Botton cases religion’s joint for something worth stealing …