﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: About This Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uncommondescent.com/darwinism/about-this-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/darwinism/about-this-blog/</link>
	<description>Serving The Intelligent Design Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:39:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: The Inoculated Mind : The Mindlog Part II, Entering the Blogosphere.</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/darwinism/about-this-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-20872</link>
		<dc:creator>The Inoculated Mind : The Mindlog Part II, Entering the Blogosphere.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 20:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/index.php/archives/69#comment-20872</guid>
		<description>[...] The science blogging community immediately recognized that DembskiÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s weblog was moderated to the point that politely disagreeing comments were not allowed. Remember the terms Ã¢â‚¬Å“boringÃ¢â‚¬Â and Ã¢â‚¬Å“unproductiveÃ¢â‚¬Â that I mentioned: it seems that they instead meant Ã¢â‚¬Å“insightfulÃ¢â‚¬Â and Ã¢â‚¬Å“fact-correcting,Ã¢â‚¬Â respectively. All the Ã¢â‚¬Å“Duhhh, evolutionists are stoopidÃ¢â‚¬Â comments approved by him were of course, very interesting and highly productive for thought-provoking, reasoned discussion. Oh, but thereÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s more! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The science blogging community immediately recognized that DembskiÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s weblog was moderated to the point that politely disagreeing comments were not allowed. Remember the terms Ã¢â‚¬Å“boringÃ¢â‚¬Â and Ã¢â‚¬Å“unproductiveÃ¢â‚¬Â that I mentioned: it seems that they instead meant Ã¢â‚¬Å“insightfulÃ¢â‚¬Â and Ã¢â‚¬Å“fact-correcting,Ã¢â‚¬Â respectively. All the Ã¢â‚¬Å“Duhhh, evolutionists are stoopidÃ¢â‚¬Â comments approved by him were of course, very interesting and highly productive for thought-provoking, reasoned discussion. Oh, but thereÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s more! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sue</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/darwinism/about-this-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-321</link>
		<dc:creator>sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 14:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/index.php/archives/69#comment-321</guid>
		<description>fbeckwith: That is very true. Personally, I try not to comment on things I know little about but I do read the comments to try and learn something. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fbeckwith: That is very true. Personally, I try not to comment on things I know little about but I do read the comments to try and learn something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fbeckwith</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/darwinism/about-this-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-312</link>
		<dc:creator>fbeckwith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2005 23:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/index.php/archives/69#comment-312</guid>
		<description>As I always say, don&#039;t get in a pissing contest with a guy with a bigger bladder.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I always say, don&#8217;t get in a pissing contest with a guy with a bigger bladder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

