http://www.uncommondescent.com/culture/call-for-public-comment-on-nasa-climate-change-summary/ Serving The Intelligent Design Community Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:17:53 +0000 hourly 1 http://www.uncommondescent.com/culture/call-for-public-comment-on-nasa-climate-change-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-294051 DLH Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:20:11 +0000 http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=3524#comment-294051 <b>REMINDER: <a href="http://wattsupwiththat.wordpress.com/2008/08/14/last-chance-today-is-the-deadline-for-comments/" rel="nofollow">Last Chance! Today is the deadline for comments</a></b> REMINDER: Last Chance! Today is the deadline for comments

]]> http://www.uncommondescent.com/culture/call-for-public-comment-on-nasa-climate-change-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-293757 F2XL Sat, 09 Aug 2008 01:40:39 +0000 http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=3524#comment-293757 I know this sounds crazy, but is global warming by definition even science at all? It seems so hell bent on making predictions (many of which turn out to be false) and insists that "testing" their theory would be dangerous, so we better not try. :roll: I know this sounds crazy, but is global warming by definition even science at all? It seems so hell bent on making predictions (many of which turn out to be false) and insists that “testing” their theory would be dangerous, so we better not try.

]]> http://www.uncommondescent.com/culture/call-for-public-comment-on-nasa-climate-change-summary/comment-page-1/#comment-293665 DLH Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:56:39 +0000 http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=3524#comment-293665 An example of the quality of NASA's current draft can be seen by its inclusion of the statistically erroneous temperature graph on page 19. See discussion at Climate Audit: <a href="http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=3384" rel="nofollow">Chucky and the U.S. CCSP </a> An example of the quality of NASA’s current draft can be seen by its inclusion of the statistically erroneous temperature graph on page 19. See discussion at Climate Audit:
Chucky and the U.S. CCSP

]]>