Home » Cosmology, News » Stephen Hawking at 70: What would revolutionize our understanding of the universe

Stephen Hawking at 70: What would revolutionize our understanding of the universe

In an exclusive interview with Stephen Hawking at 70, New Scientist (January 4, 2012) offers

NS: What discovery would do most to revolutionise our understanding of the universe?

SH: The discovery of supersymmetric partners for the known fundamental particles, perhaps at the Large Hadron Collider. This would be strong evidence in favour of M-theory. [multiverse theory]

NS: The search for supersymmetric particles is a major goal of the LHC at CERN. The standard model of particle physics would be completed by finding the Higgs boson, but has a number of problems that would be solved if all known elementary particles had a heavier “superpartner”. Evidence of supersymmetry would support M-theory, the 11-dimensional version of string theory that is the best stab so far at a “theory of everything”, uniting gravity with the other forces of nature.

Uh, among other things … including putting an end to science.

Note: Intel is exploring ways to help Hawking, who has battled motor neurone disease for nearly half a century, communicate. Any success will help many others as well.

Follow UD News at Twitter!

  • Delicious
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feed

2 Responses to Stephen Hawking at 70: What would revolutionize our understanding of the universe

  1. 1
    EndoplasmicMessenger

    OFF TOPIC: Slashdot

    Slashdot is posting an article entitled:

    Researchers Show How Cellular Complexity Can Evolve

    referencing an article at a nature.com blog:

    Resurrecting extinct proteins shows how a machine evolves

    Interesting that they should choose to use the term “machine”.

    They also reference this PLoS article:

    Protein Evolution by Molecular Tinkering: Diversification of the Nuclear Receptor Superfamily from a Ligand-Dependent Ancestor

  2. Is it more revolutionary to discover evidence for M-theory, or to discover that there is no evidence for it? It seems Multiverse is the new orthodoxy, so I would have thought the real jolter is to have to admit that this is the only Universe, fine tuning and all. Where would materialism turn then?

Leave a Reply