Category: Tree of life
|May 6, 2015||Posted by News under Intelligent Design, News, Tree of life|
From Quanta Magazine: Researchers build the world’s largest evolutionary tree and conclude that species arise because of chance mutations — not natural selection. What? They are allowed to say that now? One reason scientists are skeptical is that Hedges’ clocklike pattern conflicts with the traditional picture of how evolution unfolds. “The classic view of evolution […]
|March 12, 2015||Posted by News under News, Tree of life|
In new species emergence and diversity, according to From ScienceDaily: For the massive meta-study effort, researchers painstakingly assembled data from 2,274 molecular studies, with 96 percent published in the last decade. They built new computer algorithms and tools to synthesize this largest collection of evolutionary peer-reviewed species diversity timelines published to date to produce this […]
|January 9, 2015||Posted by News under Animal minds, Tree of life|
For human nature, evolution appears to be an endless well from which any lesson whatever can be drawn.
|January 5, 2015||Posted by News under Evolution, News, Tree of life|
|November 24, 2014||Posted by HeKS under Atheism, Darwinist rhetorical tactics, Design inference, Intelligent Design, Tree of life|
Last week, one of my comments relating to the KS “bomb” argument was made the subject of an OP, which can be found here. In that comment, I had offered a few preliminary thoughts on Keith’s argument (originally found here, and summarized by him here) and asked a few questions to better understand the assumptions informing […]
|November 7, 2014||Posted by William J Murray under Darwinism, Darwinist rhetorical tactics, Evolution, Evolutionary biology, General interest, Intelligent Design, Logic and First Principles of right reason, The Design of Life, Tree of life|
Keith brought in an argument he claimed to be a “bomb” for ID. It turned out to be a failed suicide mission where the only person that got blown up was Keith. (Please note: I am assuming that life patterns exists in an ONH, as Keith claims, for the sake of this argument only. Also, […]
|April 17, 2014||Posted by News under News, Tree of life|
An expression of cultural beliefs. Or at least, that’s the impression one gets.
|March 29, 2014||Posted by News under Intelligent Design, News, Tree of life|
Further to “Hold it despite opposition. Anything else is “fascism,” says prof,”
|March 27, 2014||Posted by News under Intelligent Design, News, Tree of life|
So if Nelson presents the kind of evidence you can read for yourself in the journals and is covered here at UD, about why the Tree of Life is matchwood, and undermines Velasco’s position, it doesn’t really count.
|March 26, 2014||Posted by News under Intelligent Design, News, Tree of life|
Have they all taken to calling that “kumbayah” circle a “forest of life” now, as in “These results support the concept of the Tree of Life (TOL) as a central evolutionary trend in the FOL as opposed to the traditional view of the TOL as a ‘species tree.’”?
|March 21, 2014||Posted by News under Intelligent Design, News, Tree of life|
For when life makes a fool of the textbooks.
|March 20, 2014||Posted by News under Intelligent Design, News, Tree of life|
Meyer: But the mode of germ-cell formation is nearly randomly distributed among the different animal groups, making it impossible to generate a coherent tree based on this characteristic …
|March 17, 2014||Posted by News under News, Tree of life|
and didn’t get a chance to write anything down.
|March 16, 2014||Posted by News under News, Tree of life|
In 2009. Can readers name any other field where these things could have been said five years ago, and it made almost no difference to the protected status of the field?
|January 30, 2014||Posted by News under Genomics, Tree of life|
BUT … we are all denounced in the article as “temporal chauvinists” for expecting precisely what we were told in school to expect of allegedly Darwinian evolution—increasing complexity.
ID Foundations, 22: What about evolutionary trees of descent and homologies? (An answer to Jaceli123’s presentation of a typical icon of evolution . . . )
As has been noted, sometimes people come to UD looking for answers to questions about what they have been taught regarding “Evolution”; typically in the context of indoctrination under the Lewontinian ideological a priori materialism that he outlined thusly in his infamous 1997 NYRB article: [T]he problem is to get [the general public] to reject […]
|December 13, 2013||Posted by News under News, Tree of life|
… like, less complex animals like sponges descended from more complex animals like comb jellies.
|November 28, 2013||Posted by News under News, Tree of life|
You’d never know from this but there are currently competing trees of life so there isn’t an “it,” exactly, to understand right now. And what there is to understand means getting involved in a controversy.
|November 26, 2013||Posted by News under News, Tree of life|
The latest Salvo features a piece on the fate of the Ol’ Deadwood.
|November 12, 2013||Posted by News under News, speciation, Tree of life|
Self-organized pattern formation proposed instead. This op-ed may be a way of opening a sustained, long-overdue discussion of just what relevance “species” has in many situations.